2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine cerebrospinal fluid parameters as biomarkers in first-episode psychosis: A prospective observational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We reviewed 29 studies that reported on findings we further organized into 10 classes of potential CSF bio-patients, covering both non-affective and affective psychoses. Among these, only one [34] analyzed the differences between the two subgroups, finding significant intergroup differences and confirming earlier observations [31]. Future studies should either include homogenous populations or analyze differences between subgroups in heterogeneous ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We reviewed 29 studies that reported on findings we further organized into 10 classes of potential CSF bio-patients, covering both non-affective and affective psychoses. Among these, only one [34] analyzed the differences between the two subgroups, finding significant intergroup differences and confirming earlier observations [31]. Future studies should either include homogenous populations or analyze differences between subgroups in heterogeneous ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In addition, one study comparing non-affective pFEP with recurrent/chronic psychoses found no significant group differences in WBC count, protein level, or OCBs [27]. Moreover, Giné-Servén et al [34] found that protein levels were more frequently elevated in affective vs. non-affective pFEP, confirming earlier observations of Endres et al [31]. In the largest available non-affective pFEP cohort to date, Campana et al [24] found OCBs in 21.8% of patients, with 12.4% of them presenting OCBs type 2 or 3.…”
Section: Inflammatory Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In most scenarios, LDH is elevated, and the underlying mechanism has been well elucidated. However, it had been claimed that the decrease of LDH had no clinical significance until it was found to decrease in psychological depression ( 33 ). There still has been reported that LDH might be dropped within people who presented the depressive symptoms when working in stressful environments ( 34 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%