2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has attracted significant interest as it can confer an additive benefit of 10–25% increased sensitivity for the detection of bile duct cancer [16,17,18,19]. FISH is usually performed on bile duct brushing cytology slides using a small panel of marker probes optimized for the detection of urinary bladder cancer [16,17,18,19]. The technique is robust, though in clinical practice it shares the same limitation of low cellularity and sampling variation that hinders cytology evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has attracted significant interest as it can confer an additive benefit of 10–25% increased sensitivity for the detection of bile duct cancer [16,17,18,19]. FISH is usually performed on bile duct brushing cytology slides using a small panel of marker probes optimized for the detection of urinary bladder cancer [16,17,18,19]. The technique is robust, though in clinical practice it shares the same limitation of low cellularity and sampling variation that hinders cytology evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the presence of 9p21 deletion was included as a positive FISH result, the sensitivity of FISH increased to 98%. Smoczynski et al evaluated 81 patients with pancreatobiliary tract strictures and reported that FISH increased the sensitivity of cytology testing from 35% to 52% with a specificity of 89% . The sensitivity of FISH was highest in a study by Boldorini et al, who reported a value of 90% .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low cellular yields are considered as the primary reason for the low sensitivity of brush cytology. Hence, various techniques have been employed to improve the sensitivity of biliary lesion diagnosis, including fluorescence in situ hybridization [4], increasing cellular yield via application of a new brush type [5,6], a new cell block technique [7], and a pre-dilation technique to disrupt strictures [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%