2007
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006003.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated open cholecystectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(21) Randomized trials evaluating the use of routine drainage following other major abdominal surgery have also failed to demonstrate benefit, even suggesting an increased complication rate with drain placement following cholecystectomy. (2225) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(21) Randomized trials evaluating the use of routine drainage following other major abdominal surgery have also failed to demonstrate benefit, even suggesting an increased complication rate with drain placement following cholecystectomy. (2225) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Placement of intraabdominal drains has been demonstrated repeatedly to increase surgical wound infections [21][22][23], especially when left more than 3 days [24]. However, true intraabdominal infections specifically have not shown a well-documented association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three of five meta-analyses (60%) [57][58][59] concerning biliary surgery compared the use of different types of drainage in various types of cholecystectomy with mixed results. The remaining meta-analyses (40%) 51,62 compared early with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy, in which no difference was found between the two techniques regarding complication rates.…”
Section: Meta-analyses Focusing On Topics Other Than Antibiotic Prophmentioning
confidence: 99%