2015
DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1120642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routes of abuse of prescription opioid analgesics: a review and assessment of the potential impact of abuse-deterrent formulations

Abstract: Prescription opioid analgesics are an important treatment option for patients with chronic pain; however, misuse, abuse and diversion of these medications are a major global public health concern. Prescription opioid analgesics can be abused via intended and non-intended routes of administration, both intact or after manipulation of the original formulation to alter the drug-delivery characteristics. Available data indicate that ingestion (with or without manipulation of the prescribed formulation) is the most… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
78
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
3
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite available opioid substitution treatments, individual differences exist with respect to which opioid addicted individuals will relapse (Bickel, Amass, Higgins et al, 1997;Epstein, Willner-Reid, Vahabzadeh et al, 2009;Preston, Kowalczyk, Phillips et al, 2017). Emerging evidence suggests that a primary aspect by which opioid addicted individuals differ is route of administration -oral versus intravenous (Back, Lawson, Singleton et al, 2011;Gasior, Bond & Malamut, 2016;Kirsh, Peppin & Coleman, 2012;Surratt, Kurtz & Cicero, 2011;Young, Havens & Leukefeld, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite available opioid substitution treatments, individual differences exist with respect to which opioid addicted individuals will relapse (Bickel, Amass, Higgins et al, 1997;Epstein, Willner-Reid, Vahabzadeh et al, 2009;Preston, Kowalczyk, Phillips et al, 2017). Emerging evidence suggests that a primary aspect by which opioid addicted individuals differ is route of administration -oral versus intravenous (Back, Lawson, Singleton et al, 2011;Gasior, Bond & Malamut, 2016;Kirsh, Peppin & Coleman, 2012;Surratt, Kurtz & Cicero, 2011;Young, Havens & Leukefeld, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, users must eventually determine how to cope with the development of tolerance that is inevitable with the persistent use of any opioid. The literature is primarily devoted to two consequences of tolerance: (1) progressing to non-oral routes of administration such as injection and inhalation, which provide a more rapid response with less drug [2][3][4][5][6] or (2) shifting to stronger opioids (prescription or illicit) to replace a weaker one to which tolerance has developed. [7][8][9][10] What is often overlooked and little understood is a seemingly obvious third pathway for coping with tolerance: increasing the number of pills/tablets ingested at one time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are notable differences in reported ROAs among prescription opioid analgesic formulations. The preferred ROA most likely reflects the level of attractiveness an abuser perceives for a certain drug, which is itself determined by a myriad of pharmacological, behavioral, and social factors . Furthermore, individual abusers often report using several different routes of abuse .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preferred ROA most likely reflects the level of attractiveness an abuser perceives for a certain drug, which is itself determined by a myriad of pharmacological, behavioral, and social factors. 24,25 Furthermore, individual abusers often report using several different routes of abuse. 26,27 In this study, the ROA pattern among both adults and adolescents who report abuse of hydrocodone IR combination products demonstrate that the predominant ROA for these opioids is the oral route (adults, 90.3%; adolescents, 81.2%) followed by snorting (adults: 23.4%, adolescents:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%