2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routeing of power lines through least-cost path analysis and multicriteria evaluation to minimise environmental impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
67
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…GIS is a widely used tool with powerful data storage, management and sharing ability and rich spatial analysis ability, which can effectively integrate multi-source sensor data, provide spatial data support for all kinds of disaster management and decision support analysis and thus significantly improve the work efficiency and management level (Qi and Altinakar, 2011;Tang and Wen, 2009;Zerger and Smith, 2003). However, current GIS applications in power line management mainly satisfy the need for basic functions in the power line industry, such as power line layout, minimum cost path analysis, evaluation of environmental impact factors, power line measurement and calculation, three dimensional display and analysis, thematic map and statistics output (Bagli et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2010). Some higher level of applications can implement power information sharing and unified management, but abilities in risk analysis, early warning and decision making are very limited (Haihong et al, 2013;Jianli et al, 2003).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GIS is a widely used tool with powerful data storage, management and sharing ability and rich spatial analysis ability, which can effectively integrate multi-source sensor data, provide spatial data support for all kinds of disaster management and decision support analysis and thus significantly improve the work efficiency and management level (Qi and Altinakar, 2011;Tang and Wen, 2009;Zerger and Smith, 2003). However, current GIS applications in power line management mainly satisfy the need for basic functions in the power line industry, such as power line layout, minimum cost path analysis, evaluation of environmental impact factors, power line measurement and calculation, three dimensional display and analysis, thematic map and statistics output (Bagli et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2010). Some higher level of applications can implement power information sharing and unified management, but abilities in risk analysis, early warning and decision making are very limited (Haihong et al, 2013;Jianli et al, 2003).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Least-cost path analysis has been used to improve planning processes; however, the majority of examples focus on either reducing the environmental impacts or the economic costs of infrastructure, such as power lines [12,13] and transit corridors [15], for urban planning. However, there are few examples of such analyses in regional mine planning, and there is great potential for utilising such tools to address some of the social and environmental issues associated with poorly planned infrastructure [11,32].…”
Section: Social-ecological Analysis In the Context Of Mine Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For linear infrastructure, least-cost path analysis has been used in GISs for planning a range of infrastructure, including power lines [12,13], pipelines [14], transit corridors [15,16], haulage roads [17,18], and recreational trails [19]. Least-cost path analysis identifies the optimal pathways between two locations as a property of the cost of traveling through different locations within an area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The framework of development opportunity indicators and restriction indicators was established with grid scale, area percentage of indicator in the grid and the concept of buffers for the analysis and manipulation of integrated evaluation model for coastal land space (Bagli et al 2011).…”
Section: Evaluation System and Indicator Scalementioning
confidence: 99%