2021
DOI: 10.1080/21681015.2020.1871084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Route selection in multimodal transportation networks: a hybrid multiple criteria decision-making approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several researchers have used multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods [for example, DEMATEL, interpretative structural modeling (ISM)] in the freight transportation operations context (e.g. Kumar and Anbanandam, 2020; Koohathongsumrit and Meethom, 2021a, 2021b; Kumar 2021; Vojinović et al., 2021). The choice of the MCDM method is directly related to the purpose of the analysis since each method is recommended for a specific type of analysis approach (Farooque et al., 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have used multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods [for example, DEMATEL, interpretative structural modeling (ISM)] in the freight transportation operations context (e.g. Kumar and Anbanandam, 2020; Koohathongsumrit and Meethom, 2021a, 2021b; Kumar 2021; Vojinović et al., 2021). The choice of the MCDM method is directly related to the purpose of the analysis since each method is recommended for a specific type of analysis approach (Farooque et al., 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Koohathongsumrit and Meethom (2021) proposed a hybrid MCDM approach that integrated the analytic hierarchy process, data envelopment analysis (DEA) and TOPSIS to address the problem based on quantitative and qualitative criteria. It utilized the advantages of each approach to reconcile conflicting criteria, converging decision makers' judgments to select the most appropriate alternative and specify the preferred order of the multimodal routes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CR is compared with the acceptable CR , which are 0.05, 0.08, and 0.10 for 3 × 3, 4 × 4, and larger synthetic pairwise comparison matrices, respectively. If the calculated CR is greater than the acceptable CR , the matrix is revised (Koohathongsumrit & Meethom, 2021b; Thapar & Sarangal, 2020).…”
Section: Proposed Integrated Fahp–zodp Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%