2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Route selection for low-carbon ammonia production: A sustainability prioritization framework based-on the combined weights and projection ranking by similarity to referencing vector method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ren and Toniolo combined DEMATEL (decision making trial and evaluation laboratory) and EDAS (evaluation based on distance from average solution) methods for identifying the best hydrogen generation technology, implying that the traditional MADM methods should be modified and then integrated for better implementing the sustainability assessment. Recently, Xu et al introduced a MADM framework for selecting the most sustainable low‐carbon ammonia production route, where a combined weighting method and a novel ranking method of PRSRV (projection ranking by similarity to referencing vector) were used, respectively, to evaluate the decision criteria and the alternative routes. According to the literature review, three suggestions could be followed, that is, creating a comprehensive criteria system, considering the data uncertainty, and integrating the MADM approaches for the sustainability assessment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ren and Toniolo combined DEMATEL (decision making trial and evaluation laboratory) and EDAS (evaluation based on distance from average solution) methods for identifying the best hydrogen generation technology, implying that the traditional MADM methods should be modified and then integrated for better implementing the sustainability assessment. Recently, Xu et al introduced a MADM framework for selecting the most sustainable low‐carbon ammonia production route, where a combined weighting method and a novel ranking method of PRSRV (projection ranking by similarity to referencing vector) were used, respectively, to evaluate the decision criteria and the alternative routes. According to the literature review, three suggestions could be followed, that is, creating a comprehensive criteria system, considering the data uncertainty, and integrating the MADM approaches for the sustainability assessment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, NH 3 is commonly employed for producing a refrigerant nitric acid, while the NH 3 ‐derived chemicals such as urea, hydrazine, and ammonia borane could serve as potential energy storages or alternative fuels . Therefore, increasing concerns have been put into the ammonia economy, from the perspective of modeling and optimization of the ammonia production technologies, utilization, storage and transportation of ammonia, and comparison and selection of the alternative systems …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Esteves et al 25 analyzed the feasibility of producing ammonia from wind and solar energies for the fertilizer production based on georeferenced data in the state of Ceara, Brazil. Esteves et al 25 analyzed the feasibility of producing ammonia from wind and solar energies for the fertilizer production based on georeferenced data in the state of Ceara, Brazil.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there are many studies related to the green ammonia and fertilizer production within the open literature. Esteves et al 25 analyzed the feasibility of producing ammonia from wind and solar energies for the fertilizer production based on georeferenced data in the state of Ceara, Brazil. The results of the study showed that using only 152 km 2 of the state, in order to use solar and wind energies, could provide ammonia for the state by 2060 and reduce the dependence on natural gas.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%