2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roundness and Sphericity of Soil Particles in Assemblies by Computational Geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zheng and Hryciw developed a computational geometry algorithm, which can automatically compute R and S values of 3D particle geometries. The computational geometry code analyzed 3D particles in Figure .…”
Section: Soil Specimen and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zheng and Hryciw developed a computational geometry algorithm, which can automatically compute R and S values of 3D particle geometries. The computational geometry code analyzed 3D particles in Figure .…”
Section: Soil Specimen and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison experimental results of different proppants with different methods include manual measurement method, Pei's method [16], the method [24] proposed by the author in 2019 named Lyu2019, Zheng's method [21], [22](based on fuzzy connectedness extraction result and S WL is selected as the sphericity) and the proposed method in this paper.…”
Section: B Sphericity and Roundness Determination Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fang et al [20] has used Fourier transform to calculate the roundness and sphericity in terms of describing the particle shape of sandy soil. Zheng and Hryciw [21], [22] and Hryciw [23] have used computational geometry methods to determine the roundness and sphericity for soil through threshold segmentation. They have used Adobe Photoshop lasso tools to delineate particles with full projections from images of three-dimensional particle assemblies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we have used the So value directly generated by the analysis tool without knowing if this value takes into consideration any parameters (such as roughness) other than roundness [21,22], since cut off amplitudes for noise and roughness were not selected [47,57]. In the case of Rw, although the Roussillon Toolbox provides the analysis conditions, the technique does not allow for the correction of the influence of roughness, as recommended by [36,37].…”
Section: Representativity Of the Shape Parameters Studiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…">Shape Parameter QuantificationThe implementation of digital images in almost all electron and optical microscopes makes quantification more accessible currently. Furthermore, computer vision-based image processing provides shape measurements of particles or granular materials [17,30,[34][35][36][37]. The quantification and analysis of particles' sizes and shapes, and their distribution, have been successfully addressed through the use of: (i) advanced programming using specialized languages (e.g., C++ and Visual basic) or software (i.e., Matlab) with a specific image processing tool box (i.e., [38,39]), (ii) commercial image processing software (e.g., Image-Pro Plus ® , Aphelion) with morphological functions and a programming module (e.g., Visual basic) to automate the procedure [40], and (iii) free and open source image processing programs (e.g., ImageJ: [35,41]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%