2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf02483283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Round-robin analysis of the RILEM TC 162-TDF beam-bending test: Part 3—Fibre distribution

Abstract: A rormd robin test programme was executed amongst several laboratories on the beam test recommended by the RILEM TC 162-TDF [1]. In the proposed test method, the mid-span deflection is to be measured on both sides of the beam (referred to as 81 and 62). A systematic fibre counting exercise was carried out on several beam sPecimens to investigate whether there is a correlation between differences between 8~ and 6z and the fibre distribution. The findings of the investigation suggest that differences between 8~ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar trend was also observed in the data from Figure 1 and in the extensive experimental results from Barr et al [31,32]. After several trials conducted to identify a general formulation that yields a good fit, (4) …”
Section: Scatter On Residual Strengthsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar trend was also observed in the data from Figure 1 and in the extensive experimental results from Barr et al [31,32]. After several trials conducted to identify a general formulation that yields a good fit, (4) …”
Section: Scatter On Residual Strengthsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For the series of models generated, the intrinsic CV (CV I ) for the number of fibres crossing this plane, for the shortest embedded length and for the angle between the fibre and a line perpendicular to the cracked plane were assessed. All these parameters should influence the final mechanical behaviour of the elements, as reported in experimental and numerical studies from the literature [24,25,30]. This outcome is related with the likelihood of obtaining big variations depending on the total number of fibres that cross the cracked section.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…RILEM recommendation TC162-TDF [28] has been backed by several research centers that investigated deflection variability using the crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) and fiber distribution in particular sample sections [29][30][31]. Toughness indexes were recommended (equivalent flexural tensile strength-f eq and residual flexural tensile strength-f R ) to define amelioration after cracking for fiber-reinforced UHPC [32,33].…”
Section: Uhpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the abovementioned reasons, we used the three-point bending test with a notch for assessments in this study. We performed the experiment by referring to the Réunion Internationale des Laboratoires et Experts des Matériaux (RILEM) and Japan Concrete Institute (JCI) standards [34,35]. Figure 1 shows a schematic of the experimental setup.…”
Section: Three-point Bending Test With a Notchmentioning
confidence: 99%