2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf02483282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Round-robin analysis of the RILEM TC 162-TDF beam-bending test: Part 2—Approximation of δ from the CMOD response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An influence of fibre type and fibre content on the slope values was not observed in this study. This finding is consistent with other research by Barr et al (2003) who reported that the ä-CMOD relationship was independent of fibre content and concrete strength. Compared with the theoretical value (0 .…”
Section: Relationship Between Mid-span Deflection and Cmodsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…An influence of fibre type and fibre content on the slope values was not observed in this study. This finding is consistent with other research by Barr et al (2003) who reported that the ä-CMOD relationship was independent of fibre content and concrete strength. Compared with the theoretical value (0 .…”
Section: Relationship Between Mid-span Deflection and Cmodsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…The new standard represents an improvement but there are still some problems when it is applied to materials exhibiting deflection-hardening behaviour (Kim et al 2008;Skazlić, Bjegović 2009). Barr and Lee (2003a, b) conducted a round robin test programme on the beam bending test recommended by RILEM TC 162-TDF. They found the recommended test is a good and robust testing system, although some minor inter-lab variations do occur.…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RILEM recommendation TC162-TDF [28] has been backed by several research centers that investigated deflection variability using the crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) and fiber distribution in particular sample sections [29][30][31]. Toughness indexes were recommended (equivalent flexural tensile strength-f eq and residual flexural tensile strength-f R ) to define amelioration after cracking for fiber-reinforced UHPC [32,33].…”
Section: Uhpcmentioning
confidence: 99%