2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roughness modeling of AlSi10Mg parts fabricated by selective laser melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
3
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
31
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed roughness is contradictory to LPBF roughness measurements reported by Boschetto et al for AlSi10Mg [9], and by Strano et al for stainless steel [10], in which the peak in roughness appeared at lower angles. As a result, the present surface roughness profile fits poorly with the model introduced by Boschetto et al Several factors will determine the final surface roughness during specimen fabrication, such as powder particle size and morphology, and process parameters.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The observed roughness is contradictory to LPBF roughness measurements reported by Boschetto et al for AlSi10Mg [9], and by Strano et al for stainless steel [10], in which the peak in roughness appeared at lower angles. As a result, the present surface roughness profile fits poorly with the model introduced by Boschetto et al Several factors will determine the final surface roughness during specimen fabrication, such as powder particle size and morphology, and process parameters.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our roughness data for the AlSi10Mg (Figure ) specimens does not match the LPBF roughness data reported by Boschetto et al for AlSi10Mg and by Strano et al for stainless steel, as well as our data of Inconel 718, in which the peak in roughness appears at lower angles. As a result, the surface roughness profile of the AlSi10Mg specimens (Figure ) fits poorly with the surface roughness model introduced by Boschetto et al Several factors will determine the final surface roughness during specimen fabrication, such as powder particle size and morphology, layer height, and process parameters.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The surface roughness vs build angle for the Inconel 718 specimens follows the trends reported by other authors for AM materials; the surface roughness is lowest for the horizontal specimen (0°), followed by a peak in roughness at 15°, and then a decline as the specimens are raised towards the vertical orientation (90°). For the 15° and 30° specimens, the surface roughness values of HIP plus aged Inconel 718 are lower than those of the as‐built specimens.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LPBF process of aluminum and aluminum alloys presents a number of challenges because of its high reflectivity and thermal conductivity and the necessity to use a high quality inert gas Metals 2017, 7, 68 2 of 9 environment during the building process [8,9]. Among commercial aluminum alloys, AlSi10Mg showed to be very suitable for AM technologies due to its composition close to the eutectic one which is responsible for its fine solidification range [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%