2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roughness evolution of metallic implant surfaces under contact loading and nanometer-scale chemical etching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to their superior mechanical and biochemical performance, Ti and CoCr alloys are continually used in current joint implant manufacturing. The previous investigation of tribocorrosion of metallic implants indicates that the CoCr surface showed more wear rate than the Ti alloy surface under the same mechanical and electrochemical stimuli, despite the greater hardness of the Co-Cr surface compared to that of the Ti alloy surface [33][34][35][36]. Previous studies agreed with the retrieval studies of hip replacements: at the CoCr-Ti junction, the harder CoCr surface showed faster wear behavior than the counter Ti surface [12,37].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, due to their superior mechanical and biochemical performance, Ti and CoCr alloys are continually used in current joint implant manufacturing. The previous investigation of tribocorrosion of metallic implants indicates that the CoCr surface showed more wear rate than the Ti alloy surface under the same mechanical and electrochemical stimuli, despite the greater hardness of the Co-Cr surface compared to that of the Ti alloy surface [33][34][35][36]. Previous studies agreed with the retrieval studies of hip replacements: at the CoCr-Ti junction, the harder CoCr surface showed faster wear behavior than the counter Ti surface [12,37].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The damaged passive film by sliding contact resulted in a significant potential drop in the negative, followed by a subsequent increase in anodic current [36]. The coefficients of friction were monitored with the measured OCP changes.…”
Section: Open Circuit Potential Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These entail direct physical fabrication methods, such as sand blast [38,39] and laser ablation [40], or pattern transferring from templates e.g. chemical etching [41][42][43][44][45][46]. To date, however, there is no agreement on the optimal values to be implemented given a particular surface.…”
Section: Economic Impact Of Surface Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a decade or so, the electrochemical anodization process is considered a low-cost surface treatment method to prepare a homogenous porous, adherent and rough titania (TiO 2 ) coating, which will induce apatite formation in living environment or simulated body fluid to enhance bioactivity [7]. The formation of thick, adherent and micro/nanoporous TiO 2 films on titanium by anodic oxidation depends on the nature and concentration of the anodizing electrolyte, voltage, current density and temperature [10]. Similarly, wet chemical etching, another low-cost surface treatment method, has attracted the attention of the researchers and their efforts to improve it due to its efficiency to fabricate nanostructure surfaces [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%