2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(03)00058-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roughness estimation for wind-load simulation experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…with the displacement height d. It has been pointed out [36] that the roughness parameters should not be based on observations below the blending height z*, defined as the height above the ground where the momentum flux becomes one-dimensional and the average flow no longer varies with the horizontal location [36]. A minimal estimate of z* is 1.5H, where H is the typical obstacle height or roughness height; for very low roughness lengths z* can be estimated by 20z 0 .…”
Section: Assessment Of Roughness Length Under Neutral Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…with the displacement height d. It has been pointed out [36] that the roughness parameters should not be based on observations below the blending height z*, defined as the height above the ground where the momentum flux becomes one-dimensional and the average flow no longer varies with the horizontal location [36]. A minimal estimate of z* is 1.5H, where H is the typical obstacle height or roughness height; for very low roughness lengths z* can be estimated by 20z 0 .…”
Section: Assessment Of Roughness Length Under Neutral Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was pioneered by Davenport and refined by Wieringa [38][39][40] based on carefully selected experimental results for homogeneous terrain. Table 1 is an updated version of the Wieringa roughness classes [36], providing the ranges of roughness length z 0 , roughness height H, displacement height d and blending height z* for a series of homogeneous terrain types.…”
Section: Assessment Of Roughness Length Under Neutral Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In principle, the obstacle and covering drop the wind speed, therefore, suspension particle retard and deposit easily (Youssef et al, 2012). Especially, the vegetation covered riverbed increase the surface roughness and roughness height (Counihan, 1975;Tieleman, 2003), it change the Aeolian dust diffusion. According to these reasons, at slower wind speed condition, the downstream village's ambient air quality might not be affected by coarse dust even if the sediment suspension from riverbed.…”
Section: Horizontal and Vertical Characteristics Of Aeolian Dustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. In fact, the discrepancy of wind speed in the atmospheric boundary-layer was influenced by terrain, vegetation and structure (Conan et al, 2015) due to the surface roughness length increasing (Tieleman, 2003). Besides, the accumulated precipitation from November 23 th to 26 th , 2010 was zero in order to obviate the influences of moisture.…”
Section: Horizontal and Vertical Characteristics Of Aeolian Dustmentioning
confidence: 99%