1986
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(1986)112:1(39)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roughness Coefficients for Routing Surface Runoff

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
219
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
17
219
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatially two soil profiles (Table 4) were applied horizontally to reflect the two main types of land cover in the catchment: grass and arable (Table 1). Manning roughness coefficients for overland flow were evaluated taking into account values reported in studies related to the catchment (Lionhope, 1990) and in the literature (Engman, 1986). This parameter was subject to calibration.…”
Section: Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatially two soil profiles (Table 4) were applied horizontally to reflect the two main types of land cover in the catchment: grass and arable (Table 1). Manning roughness coefficients for overland flow were evaluated taking into account values reported in studies related to the catchment (Lionhope, 1990) and in the literature (Engman, 1986). This parameter was subject to calibration.…”
Section: Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to the Manning's n value from literature study (Engman, 1986), the surface condition in Putih River is considered ranging from grass to woods.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis On Manning's Slope N Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gholami (2004) used SWAT to stimulate the average monthly runoff ofEmameh watershed (a sub-basin of Jajrood watershed). Results exhibited a higher sensitivity of the model to overland roughness coefficient [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Omani et al (2007) used SWAT to stimulaterunoffin the Gharesar sub-basin northwest of the Karkheh River.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Omani et al (2007) used SWAT to stimulaterunoffin the Gharesar sub-basin northwest of the Karkheh River. They found a higher sensitivity to curve number [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Saadati (2003) stimulated daily discharge and water balance in Kasillianwatershed.Resultsshowed that the model was sensitive to the annual and monthly periods and yielded more reasonable results in comparison with the daily period (Saadati 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%