1989
DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(89)90197-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rough sets and fuzzy sets-some remarks on interrelations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It possesses many features in common (to a certain extent) with the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence [54] and fuzzy set theory [39], [68]. The rough set itself is the approximation of a vague concept (set) by a pair of precise concepts, called lower and upper approximations, which are a classification of the domain of interest into disjoint categories.…”
Section: Rough Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It possesses many features in common (to a certain extent) with the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence [54] and fuzzy set theory [39], [68]. The rough set itself is the approximation of a vague concept (set) by a pair of precise concepts, called lower and upper approximations, which are a classification of the domain of interest into disjoint categories.…”
Section: Rough Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It possesses many features in common (to a certain extent) with the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence [30] and fuzzy set theory [35]. The rough set itself is the approximation of a vague concept (set) by a pair of precise concepts, called lower and upper approximations, which are a classification of the domain of interest into disjoint categories.…”
Section: VImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is really a 3-uple (A, R*(A), R * (A)), and some constraints relate the two sets in the interval-valued representation. More discussions on the difference between fuzzy sets and rough sets are in Wygralak (1989), Chanas and Kuchta (1992), Lin (1998a).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%