The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20195725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rough or Noisy? Metrics for Noise Estimation in SfM Reconstructions

Abstract: Structure from Motion (SfM) can produce highly detailed 3D reconstructions, but distinguishing real surface roughness from reconstruction noise and geometric inaccuracies has always been a difficult problem to solve. Existing SfM commercial solutions achieve noise removal by a combination of aggressive global smoothing and the reconstructed texture for smaller details, which is a subpar solution when the results are used for surface inspection. Other noise estimation and removal algorithms do not take advantag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metrics were introduced and considered to present qualitative and quantitative assessments of the results. Finally, Nikolov and Madsen [ 5 ] introduced a metric for noise estimation in highly detailed 3D SfM reconstructions. In particular, the authors discussed a possible approach to distinguishing real surface roughness from reconstruction noise and proposed a number of geometrical and statistical metrics for noise assessment based on both the reconstructed object and the capturing camera setup.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metrics were introduced and considered to present qualitative and quantitative assessments of the results. Finally, Nikolov and Madsen [ 5 ] introduced a metric for noise estimation in highly detailed 3D SfM reconstructions. In particular, the authors discussed a possible approach to distinguishing real surface roughness from reconstruction noise and proposed a number of geometrical and statistical metrics for noise assessment based on both the reconstructed object and the capturing camera setup.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%