A B S T R A C TClaims by political and news elites about the influence of visual images are far more common than actual evidence of such effects. This research attempts to gain insight into the 'power' of visual images, specifically those that accompany lexical-verbal messages in the press. We argue that the widely held notion that vivid images often drive public opinion is overly simplistic; in contrast, we posit that images most often interact with individuals' existing understandings of the world to shape information processing and judgments. With this in mind, we conducted an experiment in which news coverage was systematically altered -as including a famous photograph widely attributed great influence, or not -within otherwise constant information environments. Findings suggest that visual news images (a) influence people's information processing in ways that can be understood only by taking into account individuals' predispositions and values, and (b) at the same time appear to have a particular ability to 'trigger' considerations that spread through one's mental framework to other evaluations.
K E Y W O R D S icons information processing news media photojournalism priming visual imagesLong before the development of mass communication, students of politics were concerned with the influence of both words and visual images on people's feelings and opinions toward important issues of the day. Plato's Republic (1987, trans. Lee) advocated the banning of both poets and painters from the ideal state because of their perceived impact on people's moods and attitudes, as well as their ability to create false versions of reality. Similarsounding concerns about what we might call visual determinism have never really gone away, and today are echoed by a host of political powerholders and Journalism