2016
DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1471v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

rotl, an R package to interact with the Open Tree of Life data

Abstract: Abstract.-1. While phylogenies have been getting easier to build, it has been difficult to re-use, combine, and synthesize the information they provide because published trees are often only available as image files, and taxonomic information is not standardized across studies.2. The Open Tree of Life (OTL) project addresses these issues by providing a digital tree that 15 encompasses all organisms, built by combining taxonomic information and published phylogenies. The project also provides tools and services… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phylogenetic and non‐phylogenetic models were fitted to investigate whether non‐independence due to the degree of relatedness between species influenced both the overall effects and their level of uncertainty. Phylogenetic relatedness was estimated based on existing phylogenies and taxonomic information from the Open Tree of Life, and any polytomies were resolved by randomisation [Hinchliff et al ., 2015; via R package ‘rotl’ v3.0.7 (Michonneau, Brown, & Winter, 2016); for the final phylogenetic tree see Appendix S5]. Branch lengths were estimated using Grafen's method [Grafen, 1989; via R package ‘ape’ v5.3 (Paradis & Schliep, 2019)], and were used to construct a phylogenetic variance–covariance relatedness matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic and non‐phylogenetic models were fitted to investigate whether non‐independence due to the degree of relatedness between species influenced both the overall effects and their level of uncertainty. Phylogenetic relatedness was estimated based on existing phylogenies and taxonomic information from the Open Tree of Life, and any polytomies were resolved by randomisation [Hinchliff et al ., 2015; via R package ‘rotl’ v3.0.7 (Michonneau, Brown, & Winter, 2016); for the final phylogenetic tree see Appendix S5]. Branch lengths were estimated using Grafen's method [Grafen, 1989; via R package ‘ape’ v5.3 (Paradis & Schliep, 2019)], and were used to construct a phylogenetic variance–covariance relatedness matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control for phylogeny, we created a phylogenetic matrix of species in the dataset using the Open Tree of Life (Hinchliff et al., 2015). We used the ROTL package (Michonneau et al., 2016) to access the Open Tree of Life in R. ROTL does not calculate branch lengths for trees and thus we calculated these using the compute.brlen function in the APE package (Paradis et al., 2004). A correlation matrix of phylogenetic relatedness among species was then built using APE’s vcv function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to add value to the RPF data, phylogenetic relationships and variability indices also were assessed. The phylogenetic tree used in phylogenetic comparisons of RPF was generated from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database with R/ rotl (Michonneau et al ., ) and R/ ape (Paradis & Schliep, ). Groups included the Cupressaceae, or cypress family, as well as four groups within the Pinaceae, or pine family – the abietoid subfamily, the Pseudotsuga genus, the Pinus subgenus pinus and the Pinus subgenus strobus .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%