2016
DOI: 10.4236/am.2016.715147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rothe’s Fixed Point Theorem and the Controllability of the Benjamin-Bona-Mahony Equation with Impulses and Delay

Abstract: For many control systems in real life, impulses and delays are intrinsic phenomena that do not modify their controllability. So we conjecture that under certain conditions the abrupt changes and delays as perturbations of a system do not destroy its controllability. There are many practical examples of impulsive control systems with delays, such as a chemical reactor system, a financial system with two state variables, the amount of money in a market and the savings rate of a central bank, and the growth of a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Example The original Benjamin–Bona–Mohany Equation is a non‐linear one, in [] the authors proved the approximate controllability of the linear part of this equation, which is the fundamental base for the study of the controllability of the non linear BBM equation, which in fact, was studied in []. So, our next work is concerned with the controllability of the impulsive non linear BBM equation with delay in control and in state ztanormalΔztbnormalΔz=1ωufalse(tr1,xfalse)+ffalse(t,zfalse(tr,xfalse),ufalse(t,xfalse)false),in1emfalse(0,τfalse)×normalΩ,zfalse(t,xfalse)=0,on1emfalse(0,τfalse)×normalΩ,zfalse(s,xfalse)=ϕfalse(s,xfalse),sfalse[r,0false],xnormalΩ,ufalse(s,xfalse)=u0false(s,xfalse),sfalse[r1,0false],xnormalΩ,zfalse(tk+,xfalse)=zfalse(tk,xfalse)+Ikfalse(tk,zfalse(tk,xfalse),ufalse(tk,xfalse)false),1emk=1,2,3,,p, where 0 ≤ r 1 ≤ r < τ , a ≥ 0 and b > 0 are constants, Ω is a domain in I R N , ω is an open nonempty subset of Ω, 1 ω denotes the characteristic function of the set ω , the distributed control u ∈ L 2 (0, τ ; L 2 (Ω)), ϕ :[ − r ,0] × Ω→ I R is a continuous function and f ( t , z , u ) is a nonlinear perturbation.…”
Section: Final Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example The original Benjamin–Bona–Mohany Equation is a non‐linear one, in [] the authors proved the approximate controllability of the linear part of this equation, which is the fundamental base for the study of the controllability of the non linear BBM equation, which in fact, was studied in []. So, our next work is concerned with the controllability of the impulsive non linear BBM equation with delay in control and in state ztanormalΔztbnormalΔz=1ωufalse(tr1,xfalse)+ffalse(t,zfalse(tr,xfalse),ufalse(t,xfalse)false),in1emfalse(0,τfalse)×normalΩ,zfalse(t,xfalse)=0,on1emfalse(0,τfalse)×normalΩ,zfalse(s,xfalse)=ϕfalse(s,xfalse),sfalse[r,0false],xnormalΩ,ufalse(s,xfalse)=u0false(s,xfalse),sfalse[r1,0false],xnormalΩ,zfalse(tk+,xfalse)=zfalse(tk,xfalse)+Ikfalse(tk,zfalse(tk,xfalse),ufalse(tk,xfalse)false),1emk=1,2,3,,p, where 0 ≤ r 1 ≤ r < τ , a ≥ 0 and b > 0 are constants, Ω is a domain in I R N , ω is an open nonempty subset of Ω, 1 ω denotes the characteristic function of the set ω , the distributed control u ∈ L 2 (0, τ ; L 2 (Ω)), ϕ :[ − r ,0] × Ω→ I R is a continuous function and f ( t , z , u ) is a nonlinear perturbation.…”
Section: Final Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%