2009
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01450-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotavirus Antagonizes Cellular Antiviral Responses by Inhibiting the Nuclear Accumulation of STAT1, STAT2, and NF-κB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

8
101
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
101
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Adenovirus E1A protein inhibits TNF-a-induced NF-kB activation through suppression of IKK activity and IkBa phosphorylation (36). Rotavirus NSP1 inhibits NF-kB activation by inducing proteasomedependent degradation of b-transducin repeat-containing protein (37,38). In the current study, we report that EV71 2C protein can directly interact with IKKb by inhibiting IKKb activation and IkBa phosphorylation/degradation, and thus inhibits TNF-ainduced NF-kB activation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Adenovirus E1A protein inhibits TNF-a-induced NF-kB activation through suppression of IKK activity and IkBa phosphorylation (36). Rotavirus NSP1 inhibits NF-kB activation by inducing proteasomedependent degradation of b-transducin repeat-containing protein (37,38). In the current study, we report that EV71 2C protein can directly interact with IKKb by inhibiting IKKb activation and IkBa phosphorylation/degradation, and thus inhibits TNF-ainduced NF-kB activation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…5) compared to that of cytokine secretion in BCR-stimulated mockinfected CBC. Both the low level of production of cytokines generated by RV alone and the inhibition of BCR-induced cytokine production could be explained by an RV-dependent blockage of the nuclear accumulation of NF-B in infected cells (a critical transcription factor in B cells for the expression of some proinflammatory cytokines genes, including IL-6 and IL-8 [3]), as has been shown recently for RV (29,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…3C), suggesting that inhibition of IFN-mediated STAT1 phosphorylation is most effective at later times during infection. It was previously reported that at 6 hpi, RV-infected cells prevent STAT1 and STAT2 nuclear localization following exogenous IFN stimulation (30). Thus, in addition to the induction and release of exogenous IFN, at 6 hpi, RV may interfere with STAT1 function by blocking its nuclear localization, a step that occurs subsequent to Y701 activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Regardless of their ability to regulate IFN secretion later during infection, rotavirus infection likely triggers a conserved signaling pathway early in infection, resulting in activation of IRF3, NF-B-dependent VSIGs, and possibly IFN itself (26). We and others have found that early during infection, both RRV and UK RVs activate the cytosolic PRRs RIG-I and MDA-5 in a replication-dependent manner, and subsequent signaling mediated through the mitochondrial adaptor MAVS results in induction of several IRF3-and NF-B-dependent VSIGs and IFNs (20,23,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). However, at later times during infection (16 to 24 h postinfection [hpi]), RRV more effectively prevents IFN secretion than UK RV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation