1997
DOI: 10.1021/cr9500848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotational Tunneling and Neutron Spectroscopy:  A Compilation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
265
2
7

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 459 publications
11
265
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The plots show that the data are fitted well, although it should be emphasised that many other models might fit equally well and some care has to be taken in interpreting the results of such modelling. The activation parameters for the two methyl groups are similar and imply that they are relatively hindered [29]. The estimated tunnelling frequency from a potential barrier this size is in the 100s of kHz range, well below the Larmor frequencies involved, justifying the neglect of tunnelling terms to the relaxation [21,35].…”
Section: Methyl Group Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The plots show that the data are fitted well, although it should be emphasised that many other models might fit equally well and some care has to be taken in interpreting the results of such modelling. The activation parameters for the two methyl groups are similar and imply that they are relatively hindered [29]. The estimated tunnelling frequency from a potential barrier this size is in the 100s of kHz range, well below the Larmor frequencies involved, justifying the neglect of tunnelling terms to the relaxation [21,35].…”
Section: Methyl Group Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Fitting to such expressions involves a number of assumptions. Firstly, that quantum tunnelling effects can be ignored [21,29], which is justified here by the relatively high barriers to motion that are determined below. Secondly, that an expression that is valid for molecules tumbling in isotropic solution is also valid for powder samples under magic-angle spinning [23,30].…”
Section: C Spin-lattice Relaxation Times In Solidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is physically reasonable since the site adjacent to the CH 2 D group in I is a sp 2 -hybridized carbon, while the adjacent site in the N-CH 2 D piperidine derivative is a sp 3 -hybridized nitrogen, whose lone pair engages in a hyperconjugation interaction with the deuterated methyl group [29]. Neutron spectroscopy of methyl rotors show that sp 3 hybridization of the neighbouring atom is almost always associated with strong hindering of the methyl rotation, and therefore a small or absent tunneling splitting [38]. It is therefore plausible that the CH 2 D group has much greater rotational freedom in I, as compared to the N-CH 2 D piperidine derivative studied in reference [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curiously, no systematic spectroscopic studies of mesitylene (or 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene) derivatives have been undertaken whereas extensive studies of the protons tunneling in methyl groups have been published [8]. For the trichloro-tribromo-and triiodo-mesitylene (TCM, TBM, TIM) species, INS on powder samples [9] and on single crystals [10,11] has been used to establish that the three methyl groups in each molecule have a different tunneling gap, which is contrary to what is expected for a molecule with true C 3h symmetry.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the trichloro-tribromo-and triiodo-mesitylene (TCM, TBM, TIM) species, INS on powder samples [9] and on single crystals [10,11] has been used to establish that the three methyl groups in each molecule have a different tunneling gap, which is contrary to what is expected for a molecule with true C 3h symmetry. For TIM, for example, three excitations were observed at 15, 24 and 89 eV [8,9]. This difference in tunneling gaps is due to the difference in the intermolecular interactions exerted on the methyl groups located in non equivalent sites in the triclinic crystal cell.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%