2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotational spectroscopic study of S-methyl thioformate

Abstract: Context. S-methyl thioformate CH3SC(O)H is a monosulfur derivative of methyl formate, a relatively abundant component of the interstellar medium (ISM). S-methyl thioformate being, thermodynamically, the most stable isomer, it can be reasonably proposed for detection in the ISM. Aims. This work aims to experimentally study and theoretically analyze the ground and first torsional excited states for CH3SC(O)H in a large spectral range for astrophysical use. Methods. S-methyl thioformate was synthesized as a resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known in the literature that the barriers to methyl internal rotation in oxygen analogues are higher than those in sulphur analogues. Some examples of the barriers in general cases are dimethyl sulphide (735.8 cm −1 ) 11 vs. dimethyl ether (944.3 cm −1 ) 12 or methyl thioformate (127.5 cm −1 ) 13 vs. methyl formate (370.9 cm −1 ). 14 For molecules containing a furan or thiophene moiety, available examples are 194.1 cm −1 for 2-methylthiophene 15 vs. 416.2 cm −1 for 2-methylfuran, 16 258.8 cm −1 for 3-methylthiophene 17 vs. 380.5 cm −1 for 3-methylfuran, 18 or 248.0 cm −1 for 2,5-dimethylthiophene 19 vs. 439.1 cm −1 for 2,5-dimethylfuran.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known in the literature that the barriers to methyl internal rotation in oxygen analogues are higher than those in sulphur analogues. Some examples of the barriers in general cases are dimethyl sulphide (735.8 cm −1 ) 11 vs. dimethyl ether (944.3 cm −1 ) 12 or methyl thioformate (127.5 cm −1 ) 13 vs. methyl formate (370.9 cm −1 ). 14 For molecules containing a furan or thiophene moiety, available examples are 194.1 cm −1 for 2-methylthiophene 15 vs. 416.2 cm −1 for 2-methylfuran, 16 258.8 cm −1 for 3-methylthiophene 17 vs. 380.5 cm −1 for 3-methylfuran, 18 or 248.0 cm −1 for 2,5-dimethylthiophene 19 vs. 439.1 cm −1 for 2,5-dimethylfuran.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, searches for diverse S-bearing molecules of increasing complexity, such as thioformamide (NH 2 CHS; Motiyenko et al 2020), thioacetamide (CH 3 C(S)NH 2 ; Remijan et al 2022), thioacetaldehyde (CH 3 CHS; Margulès et al 2020), and methyl thioformate (CH 3 SC(O)H, Jabri et al 2020), have remained so far unfruitful. All the above aspects align with the fact that almost the entire census of detected interstellar S-bearing molecules are S-analogs of the most abundant O-bearing species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other one is ethyl mercaptan (hereafter C 2 H 5 SH) which was tentatively detected toward Orion KL (Kolesniková et al 2014). Other searches for complex S-bearing molecules were unsuccessful, such as CH 3 CHS (thioacetaldehyde; Margulès et al 2020), NH 2 CHS (thioformamide; Motiyenko et al 2020) and CH 3 SC(O)H (S-methyl thioformate; Jabri et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%