2021
DOI: 10.3103/s0747923921020262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotational Seismology: Review of Achievements and Outlooks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rotational sensors measure the rotation directly, and hence also tilt of the ground. They are not sensitive to translational ground motion, as noted by Bernauer et al (2012) and Kislov & Gravirov (2021). The seismic wave field consists of different phases, including body waves (Pand S-waves) and surface waves (Love and Rayleigh waves) (Aki and Richards, 2002).…”
Section: 2b Rotational Sensors (Sagnac Effect)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotational sensors measure the rotation directly, and hence also tilt of the ground. They are not sensitive to translational ground motion, as noted by Bernauer et al (2012) and Kislov & Gravirov (2021). The seismic wave field consists of different phases, including body waves (Pand S-waves) and surface waves (Love and Rayleigh waves) (Aki and Richards, 2002).…”
Section: 2b Rotational Sensors (Sagnac Effect)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The revised output in Figure 4 correspond to the theory, which indicates the records of RotSensor3C are quantified. As a new designed 3C rotational seismometer, here we select another two kinds of wellknown three components rotation sensors (R-2, BlueSeis3A) [24] and draw a comparison shown as the Table 1. Notice that the Rotsensor3C and R-2 have no battery inside, so the comparison of dimensions and weight just for reference only.…”
Section: Sensor-axis Orthogonalitymentioning
confidence: 99%