2012
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/053012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotational hot Brownian motion

Abstract: We establish an effective Markov theory for the rotational Brownian motion of hot nanobeads and nanorods. Compact analytical expressions for the effective temperature and friction are derived from the fluctuating hydrodynamic equations of motion. They are verified by comparison with recent measurements and with parallel molecular dynamics simulations over a wide temperature range. This provides unique insights into the physics of hot Brownian motion and an excellent starting point for further experimental test… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 is calculated using equation (1), implying a pressure-dependent Stokes rotational drag coefficient. The discrepancy between the model and experimental values at pressures below 10 Pa could be attributed to particle instability induced by heat because of light absorption2223, while the low pressure particle loss might be due to the large inertial forces experienced by the particle at high rotation rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…2 is calculated using equation (1), implying a pressure-dependent Stokes rotational drag coefficient. The discrepancy between the model and experimental values at pressures below 10 Pa could be attributed to particle instability induced by heat because of light absorption2223, while the low pressure particle loss might be due to the large inertial forces experienced by the particle at high rotation rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…One finds that rotation and translation, exciting different solvent flow fields, have their own effective temperatures. [16,72] Far from equilibrium, temperature is thus seen to loose its universal character and to become more of an interaction parameter between the particle and its solvent, akin to the equilibrium friction coefficients ζ, say, which also differ between rotation and translation. In general, the effective parameters are complicated functions of the molecular temperature and viscosity fields TðrÞ, hðrÞ, (their spatial distribution for a hot Brownian particle is shown in Figure 2) and the solvent velocity field excited by the particle motion.…”
Section: A Perfect Paradigm: Hot Brownian Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a hot particle in a cool solvent, the kinetic degrees of freedom are always hotter than the spatial ones, and for example rotation is hotter than translation. [72] Considering a weakly damped hot Brownian particle trapped in a harmonic potential -a situation of high practical interest e. g. for nanoparticles controlled by optical tweezers [50,57] -then leads to the fancy notion of "Brownian thermospectrometry". [33] The characterizing observable of the setup can be chosen to be the particle position xðtÞ and the confinement force is mw 2 0 xðtÞ.…”
Section: A Perfect Paradigm: Hot Brownian Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus linearly polarized beam traps may result in more a pronounced difference in stiffness between US and NS gold NPs. We note that as discussed by Seol et al and others, trap stiffness is subject to laser-induced heating of trapped gold NPs, 4,[17][18][19] which is modeled using COMSOL and described later in this paper. As a result of the relatively low optical power of 45 mW in our case, the expected particle temperature rise (∼10 • C for 100 nm gold NPs) should have but little effect on stiffness measurement.…”
Section: B Trapping In Liquidmentioning
confidence: 99%