2000
DOI: 10.1002/9780470141724.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotational Diffusion and Dielectric Relaxation in Nematic Liquid Crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here δ mn and τ mn denote the relaxation strength and the relaxation time of the (mn)th mode, respectively. Analytical solutions have been found by Coffey and Kalmykov [16]. The dielectric relaxation strength for a mode will be a part of its scaling factor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here δ mn and τ mn denote the relaxation strength and the relaxation time of the (mn)th mode, respectively. Analytical solutions have been found by Coffey and Kalmykov [16]. The dielectric relaxation strength for a mode will be a part of its scaling factor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explains the observed behavior of the crossover temperature in as frequency dependent. The calculation of relaxation times in terms of the nematic potential and S by Saupe is extended by Coffey and Kalmykov [16], who find the exact solutions for the various relaxation times. Each of these permittivities thus shows at least two relaxation modes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the linear response theory, Luckhurst and Zannoni derived the relation between the complex dielectric permittivity ε * k ( ω ) = ε ′ k ( ω ) − iε ″ k ( ω ) and the macroscopic relaxation function Φ k ( t ) ( k = ||, ⊥) italicεitalick*italicωεkitalicεitalick*italicωitalicRitalickitalicωitalicεitalick*italicωitalicεkitalicεk0italicεitalick*italicωεkitalicεk0italicRk0italicεk0italicεkitalicεitalick*italicω=0dnormalΦitalickitalict/dtwhere R k is the reaction field factor, and subscripts 0 and ∞ denote, respectively, the frequencies much below and above the relaxation domain. Because the local field problem was not solved as yet, the permittivity is usually related to the microscopic correlation function γ k ( t ), and Eqn takes the form: italicεitalick*italicωεk=italicGitalickitalicLitaliciωitalicγtrue˙italictwhere G k is the total local field factor and is assumed frequency independent, γ k ( t ) is the dipole correlation function and L iω means the Laplace transform. The relation between the relaxation time τ DS [being integral of Φ( t )] and the correlation time τ μ [being integral of γ ( t )] is unknown as yet,…”
Section: Remarks On the Ds Studies Of Nematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the local field problem was not solved as yet, the permittivity is usually related to the microscopic correlation function γ k ( t ), and Eqn takes the form: italicεitalick*italicωεk=italicGitalickitalicLitaliciωitalicγtrue˙italictwhere G k is the total local field factor and is assumed frequency independent, γ k ( t ) is the dipole correlation function and L iω means the Laplace transform. The relation between the relaxation time τ DS [being integral of Φ( t )] and the correlation time τ μ [being integral of γ ( t )] is unknown as yet, so in practice, both times are treated as equivalent. According to Luckhurst and Zannoni, the relaxation times for nematics are dependent upon the order parameter S = trueP¯2italiccosθ.…”
Section: Remarks On the Ds Studies Of Nematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation