1999
DOI: 10.1063/1.478235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotation–vibration interactions in (HF)2. II. Rotation–vibration interactions in low-lying vibrational states

Abstract: Results of a six-dimensional treatment of the rotation–vibration Hamiltonian for (HF)2 are presented. Energies of 40(J+1) states for J⩽4 are reported. These energies and the corresponding wave functions are used to analyze rotation–vibration interactions in (HF)2. Over the range of energies probed in this study, Coriolis couplings are found to be relatively unimportant and for 94% of the states the wave functions and energies can be approximated by the solutions to a Hamiltonian in which the Coriolis coupling … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, where rotational excitation of the ground state tunneling pair is schematically depicted for Jϭ0, 1, 2, and 3. The ground-state tunneling splitting of 0.44, 0.77, 1.62, and 3.48 cm Ϫ1 calculated here for Kϭ0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively, agree within 0.01 cm Ϫ1 with the corresponding values obtained by Wu et al 47 The effective rotational constant B ϭ(BϩC)/2 calculated to be 0.216 90 and 0.216 85 cm Ϫ1 for the ground state tunneling pair compares well to the experimental values of 0.216 71 and 0.216 58 cm Ϫ1 . 48 The quartic centrifugal distortion constant in the ground state is calculated as 2ϫ10 Ϫ6 cm Ϫ1 , while the corresponding experimental value is 2.06 ϫ10 Ϫ6 cm Ϫ1 .…”
Section: B "Hf…supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2, where rotational excitation of the ground state tunneling pair is schematically depicted for Jϭ0, 1, 2, and 3. The ground-state tunneling splitting of 0.44, 0.77, 1.62, and 3.48 cm Ϫ1 calculated here for Kϭ0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively, agree within 0.01 cm Ϫ1 with the corresponding values obtained by Wu et al 47 The effective rotational constant B ϭ(BϩC)/2 calculated to be 0.216 90 and 0.216 85 cm Ϫ1 for the ground state tunneling pair compares well to the experimental values of 0.216 71 and 0.216 58 cm Ϫ1 . 48 The quartic centrifugal distortion constant in the ground state is calculated as 2ϫ10 Ϫ6 cm Ϫ1 , while the corresponding experimental value is 2.06 ϫ10 Ϫ6 cm Ϫ1 .…”
Section: B "Hf…supporting
confidence: 91%
“…For Kϭ2 and 3, these energy differences are smaller than 10 Ϫ6 cm Ϫ1 . We refer to the study by Wu et al 47 for a very detailed analysis of the K-dependence of the rotational constant A.…”
Section: B "Hf…mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, by being able to calculate observable properties from first principles, one can improve his or her understanding of the underlying physics behind the observed phenomena. [3][4][5] In addition, by noting discrepancies between experiment and theory, one can modify potential energy surfaces in order to improve this agreement. [6][7][8][9][10] Over the past several decades, advances in theoretical approaches [11][12][13][14][15][16] and computational resources have made it possible to calculate the vibrational spectrum of a variety of strongly bound tri-and tetra-atomic molecules and clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the experimental side, much work has been done to determine its structure and tunneling dynamics, [9][10][11][12][13][14] vibrational predissociation lifetimes, [15][16][17][18][19][20] and rotational product state distributions. [21][22][23][24] On the theoretical side, the dimer has also been studied in a variety of ways, using quantum Monte Carlo methods, [25][26][27] four-dimensional rigid rotor 28 -31 and full six-dimensional ͑6D͒ bound state calculations, [32][33][34][35][36][37] as well as vibrational predissociation calculations. 33,[37][38][39] In the theoretical work, several potential energy surfaces ͑PESs͒ have been used, 25,[40][41][42] 43 which is based on explicitly correlated second-order Møller-Plesset calculations, and which is adjusted to reproduce the experimental dissociation energy and monomer stretch frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%