1996
DOI: 10.1051/aas:1996141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotation of solar-like main sequence stars

Abstract: Abstract. -The results of the photometric survey of 16 solar-type, active, field stars are presented. During our observations 9 stars showed appreciable light variability with amplitudes of a few hundredths of a magnitude but for three of them periods could not be determined. Most of the observed variable stars have periods shorter than about 10 days. It is suggested that, similarly as is observed in the Hyades cluster, small amplitude light variations are quite common among active field solar-type dwarfs with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have found about 80 stars with measured calcium emission flux and about 40 with magnesium emission fluxes. Our main sources of data were the papers by Stȩpień (1994), Saar & Brandenburg (1999) and Messina et al (2001), with a couple of periods taken from Stȩpień & Geyer (1996). References to original determinations of rotation periods and chromospheric fluxes can be found in the first three papers.…”
Section: Observed Magnetic Filling Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have found about 80 stars with measured calcium emission flux and about 40 with magnesium emission fluxes. Our main sources of data were the papers by Stȩpień (1994), Saar & Brandenburg (1999) and Messina et al (2001), with a couple of periods taken from Stȩpień & Geyer (1996). References to original determinations of rotation periods and chromospheric fluxes can be found in the first three papers.…”
Section: Observed Magnetic Filling Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each given measurement at time t which does not show There is no long-term variation for these two stars. Bottom panel shows the periodic variation detected for HD 38392 with a period of 21.4 days corresponding to its rotational period (Stepień & Geyer 1995) this variation allows to eliminate the period P 1 given by the time difference between the measurement and the date November 10: P = P 1 = t − t 11/10/1981 . In fact, considering that if this event had occurred again, it would have been detectable during one day (which is a very conservative assumption), each measurement allows to eliminate the range of period P 1 plus or minus half a day.…”
Section: Constraints On Future β Pictoris Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values of , the logarithmic ratio of the chro-R HK mospheric luminosity in the calcium H and K lines to the total photospheric emission, are taken from Soderblom (1985), Soderblom & Mayor (1993a), Henry et al (1996), and Baliunas et al (1996). Rotation periods are from Noyes et al (1984), Henry, Fekel, & Hall (1995), Donahue, Saar, & Baliunas (1996), Stepień & Geyer (1996), and Güdel et al (1997a).…”
Section: Sin Fbfmentioning
confidence: 99%