2008
DOI: 10.1364/ol.33.001503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotating orthogonal polarization imaging

Abstract: Surface reflections often present a problem in the polarization difference imaging of tissue. The technique described involves illumination in a single polarization state and detection in the orthogonal polarization state. Synchronously rotating both the illumination and orthogonal detection states provides an image free from surface reflections that is sensitive to the polarization properties of the underlying tissue. Results on tissue phantoms demonstrate that polarization sensitive measurements of a test ta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parallel detection captures photons with its original polarization state from both superficial and deeper tissue. The perpendicular detection removes the specular reflection and photons from superficial layer; thus the signal from deeper tissue can be highlighted as suggested by Morgan et al [26], which is the main difference compared with superficial detection in pSFDI. The polarization difference imaging is able to perform superficial detection, however, the imaging depth solely depends on the depolarization capability of the sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The parallel detection captures photons with its original polarization state from both superficial and deeper tissue. The perpendicular detection removes the specular reflection and photons from superficial layer; thus the signal from deeper tissue can be highlighted as suggested by Morgan et al [26], which is the main difference compared with superficial detection in pSFDI. The polarization difference imaging is able to perform superficial detection, however, the imaging depth solely depends on the depolarization capability of the sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These results are free from surface reflections from both the tissue and the components within the system. Images obtained with the copolar system are dominated by surface reflections from the tissue surface and optical components and have been presented elsewhere 15 to demonstrate the improvement in performance achieved using ROPI. To provide an indication of the dynamic range of the system, it is useful to compare the polarization difference values for the highly organized bovine tendon tissue ͓Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35][36][37][38] Polarized light imaging has been used extensively to enhance surface contrast for dermatologic applications. 39 Demarcation of margins of skin cancers, not visible to the naked eye, has been conducted by several researchers, starting with setups focusing on linear depolarization to other systems, [40][41][42][43] utilizing full Stokes vector polarimetry and out-of-plane approaches. [44][45][46] The skin stratum corneum has been shown to be highly scattering hence producing strong depolarization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%