2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1836881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotating-field magnetoresistance of exchange-biased spin valves

Abstract: We investigate the magnetoresistance (MR) of spin valves by (i) varying the strength of the field applied in a fixed direction and (ii) rotating the field with fixed strength. The latter data reflect in general a mixture of giant and anisotropic magnetoresistance (GMR and AMR). We present an experimental procedure to suppress the AMR contributions of all ferromagnetic layers in the spin valve without disturbing the GMR response. The resulting angular MR curves are fitted with a single-domain model to determine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bias fields measured from R­(H) tests are determined by the average pinning field of the entire FM-AFM interfaces, while the values from M­(H) curves are dominated by the weakest site for the occurrence of nucleation during the magnetization reversal. , Hence the M­(H) technique measures the lowest limit of the actual H EB associated with the weakest pinned region, and thus gives much smaller values than those from R­(H) tests. In the material systems with uniform exchange coupling at the interface, the H EB values measured from M­(H) and R­(H) tests agree with each other, as observed in FeMn/NiFe exchange biased spin valves and high-quality CoO/Co and CoO/Fe bilayers . On the other hand, the discrepancy of H EB becomes significant in the presence of irreversible AFM domain formation and rearranged spin coupling, which strongly relates to the interface structure and geometry.…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…The bias fields measured from R­(H) tests are determined by the average pinning field of the entire FM-AFM interfaces, while the values from M­(H) curves are dominated by the weakest site for the occurrence of nucleation during the magnetization reversal. , Hence the M­(H) technique measures the lowest limit of the actual H EB associated with the weakest pinned region, and thus gives much smaller values than those from R­(H) tests. In the material systems with uniform exchange coupling at the interface, the H EB values measured from M­(H) and R­(H) tests agree with each other, as observed in FeMn/NiFe exchange biased spin valves and high-quality CoO/Co and CoO/Fe bilayers . On the other hand, the discrepancy of H EB becomes significant in the presence of irreversible AFM domain formation and rearranged spin coupling, which strongly relates to the interface structure and geometry.…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…The angular variation of magnetoresistance at fixed magnetic fields of exchanged-bias SVs has been studied by many authors [31,32]. This technique is very useful for testing models and allows investigating magnetic anisotropies in SVs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FeMn is often used as the AFM layer in spin valves. FeMn requires an face centred cubic (FCC) seed layer, such as NiFe, Co or Cu, in order to crystallize the antiferromagnetic γ-FCC phase responsible for exchange bias [3][4][5][6][7].Fe-Mn alloys can undergo all of the three major types of martensitic transformations of Fe-based alloys, i.e. .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%