1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19991101)413:4<520::aid-cne3>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rostral wulst of passerine birds: II. Intratelencephalic projections to nuclei associated with the auditory and song systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These five were: 1) A lamina that separates our revised dorsal mesopallium from the intercalated hyperpallium, previously named in some studies as lamina frontalis suprema [abbreviated LFM in the 2004[abbreviated LFM in the -2005, which we propose to rename as lamina mesopallium dorsalis (LMD); 2) A lamina located between our revised dorsal mesopallium and ventral mesopallium, which has been unintentionally given various names in the literature due to the aforementioned problems, including lamina frontalis superior (LFS) in the revised nomenclature Table 2). Instead, as noted in Wild and Williams (1999), the number of laminae we found from the dorsal telencephalic surface to the nidopallium are three, all separating different parts of our revised mesopallium and adjacent brain subdivisions. For this reason, we believe including the term mesopallium in their names as LMD, LMI, and LMV is appropriate ( Fig.…”
Section: Section Iii: Laminamentioning
confidence: 53%
“…These five were: 1) A lamina that separates our revised dorsal mesopallium from the intercalated hyperpallium, previously named in some studies as lamina frontalis suprema [abbreviated LFM in the 2004[abbreviated LFM in the -2005, which we propose to rename as lamina mesopallium dorsalis (LMD); 2) A lamina located between our revised dorsal mesopallium and ventral mesopallium, which has been unintentionally given various names in the literature due to the aforementioned problems, including lamina frontalis superior (LFS) in the revised nomenclature Table 2). Instead, as noted in Wild and Williams (1999), the number of laminae we found from the dorsal telencephalic surface to the nidopallium are three, all separating different parts of our revised mesopallium and adjacent brain subdivisions. For this reason, we believe including the term mesopallium in their names as LMD, LMI, and LMV is appropriate ( Fig.…”
Section: Section Iii: Laminamentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Most of the auditory input from CM to NIf originates from a subdivision of CM, known as nucleus avalanche (Av), that is defined by its strong reciprocal connections with both NIf and HVC (Nottebohm et al, 1982; Akutagawa and Konishi, 2010). NIf also receives a likely somatosensory input from the rostral Wulst (Wild and Williams, 1999). Finally, NIf may receive multisensory (somatosensory, visual and auditory) input from Uva, which also projects directly to HVC (Bischof and Engelage, 1985; Wild, 1994; Coleman et al, 2007; Mendez et al, 2009).…”
Section: Anatomical and Physiological Characteristics Of Nifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On account of the status of the telencephalic origin and spinal targets it can be concluded that the TSMb and pyr are homologous systems, thus supporting the earlier conclusion of Wild & Williams (1999, 2000.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Wild & Williams (1999, 2000 setfled the question of the avian pyr: In a tracing study in zebra-finches and green finches they could follow labelled TSMb fibres into the spinal cord to about the level of C6 or C7. Injections of retrograde tracers in these targets of the pyr labelled cells exclusively in the HA.…”
Section: An Avian Pyramidal Tract?mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation