Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3366423.3380038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ROSE: Role-based Signed Network Embedding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identify the key weakness of existing embedding methods as that they only preserve weak similarity consistency. In particular, signed embedding methods [4,21,22,26,54,57] just ensure signed similarity consistency-positively related pairs are separable from negatively related pairs-for sign prediction. And similarly, unsigned embedding methods [14,20,42] only guarantee the topological similarity consistency-topologically close node pairs are separable from distant pairs-for link prediction.…”
Section: Limitation Of Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We identify the key weakness of existing embedding methods as that they only preserve weak similarity consistency. In particular, signed embedding methods [4,21,22,26,54,57] just ensure signed similarity consistency-positively related pairs are separable from negatively related pairs-for sign prediction. And similarly, unsigned embedding methods [14,20,42] only guarantee the topological similarity consistency-topologically close node pairs are separable from distant pairs-for link prediction.…”
Section: Limitation Of Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And similarly, unsigned embedding methods [14,20,42] only guarantee the topological similarity consistency-topologically close node pairs are separable from distant pairs-for link prediction. While positive links are detectable as the intersection of positive and topologically [20]) and (b) signed embedding (ROSE [22]) fail to do so.…”
Section: Limitation Of Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another relevant question is (Q2) how should random-walk embeddings be used for link prediction? Following node2vec [26], several works train classifiers to predict missing links based on a set of labelled pairs (edges and non-edges) [30,40,62]. This is counter-intuitive given that the embedding problem is often defined in terms of dot products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%