2018
DOI: 10.1177/1042258718796089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roots to Grow: Family Firms and Local Embeddedness in Rural and Urban Contexts

Abstract: This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the final publisher proof-corrections or journal pagination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
110
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
4
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Family firms also invest more in human capital in the form of union relations, employee involvement and protection, retirement benefits, cash profit sharing, health and safety than non-family firms (Kang & Kim, 2019;Sanchez-Bueno, Muñoz-Bullón, & Galan, 2019). Moreover, they are known for investing in superior relationships with clients, suppliers and community (Baù, Chirico, Pittino, Backman, & Klaesson, 2018;Lamb & Butler, 2016;Le Breton-Miller et al, 2010). Thus, we argue that many family firms, thanks to their long-term orientation regarding superior innovation-and employee-related investments, are more likely to achieve a higher growth rate than their non-family counterparts.…”
Section: Stunted Growth Vs Superior Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family firms also invest more in human capital in the form of union relations, employee involvement and protection, retirement benefits, cash profit sharing, health and safety than non-family firms (Kang & Kim, 2019;Sanchez-Bueno, Muñoz-Bullón, & Galan, 2019). Moreover, they are known for investing in superior relationships with clients, suppliers and community (Baù, Chirico, Pittino, Backman, & Klaesson, 2018;Lamb & Butler, 2016;Le Breton-Miller et al, 2010). Thus, we argue that many family firms, thanks to their long-term orientation regarding superior innovation-and employee-related investments, are more likely to achieve a higher growth rate than their non-family counterparts.…”
Section: Stunted Growth Vs Superior Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second level, a meso-context has been explored to a lesser extent (Stough et al, 2015 (Baù et al, 2019;Karlsson, 2018), for family engagement in collective entrepreneurial activities (Hadjielias and Poutziouris, 2015), and for the particular case of family-run start-ups (Bird and Wennberg, 2014), as well as the importance of industrial districts (Cucculelli and Storai, 2015). The third level, the macro-context, identifies economic, social, and cultural patterns that condition the economic activities of a family in business across generations (Gupta and Levenburg, 2010;Levenburg and Gupta, 2012), such as transgenerational entrepreneurship (Basco et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Phenomenon Of Entrepreneurial Families In Business Acrosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among other factors, growth is dependent on a firm's strategy (e.g., Baum et al ., 2001; Davidsson & Wiklund, 2013; Geyer, 2016) as it can be interpreted as a strategic goal set at the top management level (Greve, 2008). This situation is especially valid in the context of family firms (Baù et al ., 2019), which rely heavily on internal financing and, therefore, need to carefully plan business growth goals and processes as these activities involve investments of resources that may place the business at risk. According to Hamelin (2013), family firms are prone to limiting firms' growth by adopting conservative growth behavior that reduces placing the family wealth at risk (Zellweger & Sieger, 2012).…”
Section: Literature and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‘They find that next‐generation family firms invest less in capital equipment and R&D and exploit fewer new technologies or markets, leading to slower growth compared with founder‐controlled firms’ (Molly et al ., 2011, p.707). However, according to other studies, specific family‐based resources allow a family firm to generate a competitive advantage over non‐family firms such that higher growth can be expected in family firms (e.g., Baù et al ., 2019; Sirmon & Hitt, 2003). Thus, family involvement in ownership or management has the potential to increase business growth.…”
Section: Literature and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation