2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rooting traits of peanut genotypes with different yield responses to terminal drought

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
21
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ratnakumar and Vadez (2011) also obtained positive correlation for root traits and total dry weight in peanut. Previous study showed that 'Tifton 8' showed highest root dry weight, maintaining high pod yield in the field under stress condition (Koolachart et al, 2013). In pot experiment, we found that 'KK60-3' gave high root traits, maintained high pod yield under terminal drought condition, while 'Tifton 8' showed high biomass with high root trait.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Ratnakumar and Vadez (2011) also obtained positive correlation for root traits and total dry weight in peanut. Previous study showed that 'Tifton 8' showed highest root dry weight, maintaining high pod yield in the field under stress condition (Koolachart et al, 2013). In pot experiment, we found that 'KK60-3' gave high root traits, maintained high pod yield under terminal drought condition, while 'Tifton 8' showed high biomass with high root trait.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Koolachart et al (2013) showed that terminal drought caused 38%-42% yield reduction. ICGV 98324 and ICGV 98348 showed the highest PY under stress conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drought conditions were defined as one-third of the available water (1/3 AW) of soil moisture, or terminal drought (Girdthai et al, 2010). Normal practices were performed to control weeds, diseases, and insects (Koolachart et al, 2013).…”
Section: Experimental Design and Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct comparison of root dry weight among the results of different studies is not possible because different methods were used for quantifying root dry weight. The previous studies used monolith method (Jongrungklang et al., ; Koolachart et al., ), whereas this study used rhizobox method, and the results are expected to be different. Jongrungklang et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The absence of suitable technologies to define root architecture accurately under field conditions is a major obstacle to the genetic improvement of root traits associated with drought tolerance. Many studies have investigated root growth using an auger method (Jongrungklang et al., ; Koolachart et al., ; Songsri et al., ). By studying root growth characteristics in a rhizobox with a needle board, the root growth patterns and morphology are more easily defined (Thangthong, Jogloy, Pensuk, Kesmala, & Vorasoot, ) and allow researchers to compare and contrast different genetic material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%