Root water transport of Helianthus annuus L. under iron oxide nanoparticle exposure

Abstract

The application of nanomaterials in commercially available products is increasing rapidly for agriculture, phytoremediation and biotechnology. Since plants suppose the first sink for the accumulation of nanoparticles from the environment, emerging studies have focused on the general consequences for plants and their effects on the biomass production. However, effects on the root surface, as well as blockage of nutrients and water uptake by the roots, may also occur. This experiment was designed to prove if the plant water relations can be affected by the adsorption of nanoparticles on the root surface, causing a consequent stress for the plants. With this goal, plants of Helianthus annuus were previously grown in a hydroponic culture, and at age of 55 days, their roots were exposed to three different concentrations of nanomaghemite (NM) in the hydroponic solution for 5 days: control without NM; 50 and 100 mg l(-1) NM. The main effect was related to the reduction of the root hydraulic conductivity (Lo) and the nutrients uptake. The concentrations of the macronutrients Ca, K, Mg and S in the shoot were reduced relative to the control plants, which resulted in lower contents of chlorophyll pigments. Although stress was not detected in the plants, after the analysis of stress markers like the accumulation of proline or ascorbate in the tissues, reduction of the root functionality by nanoparticles has been identified here, manifested as the effect of NM on Lo. The treatment with 50 mg l(-1) NM significantly reduced the Lo, by up to 57% of its control value, and it was reduced by up to 26% at 100 mg l(-1) NM. These results will be an important factor to take into account with regard to the applicability of NM for long-term use in crops, particularly during privative water conditions.

Plant Explants Grown on Medium Supplemented with Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Have a Significant Increase in Embryogenesis

“…Iron oxides and their aggregates cling to the negatively charge cell surface due to electrostatic adhesion [34]. This blocking effect of NPs inhibits sufficient water uptake [37]. According to the literature, most plants accumulate heavy metals in roots [19].…”

Biosynthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles Using Bacillus Subtilis: Characterization and Nutritive Significance for Promoting Plant Growth in Zea mays L

“… 47 Due to phytotoxicity, plant growth may be slow, decrease in plant hormones, change in transcriptional genes profile and decreased photosynthetic rate had been observed. 48 - 50 Yusefi-Tanha et al 51 found that small sized CuO nanoparticles (25 nm diameter) were more phytotoxic than large sized CuO nanoparticles (50 nm and 250 nm) to Soybean. Moreno-Olivas et al 52 reported that nanoparticles interaction with plant cell could lead to change in plant genes expression.…”

Hormetic Response by Silver Nanoparticles on In Vitro Multiplication of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Cv. Mex 69-290) Using a Temporary Immersion System

“…Boron reduction could be due to the immobilization of this element in the medium by the adsorption capacities of NPs. 41 There is insufficient information to understand how AgNPs affect nutrient absorption. Zuverza-Mena et al 37 suggest that it is possible that AgNPs physically block the diffusion pathway or the channels for active absorption.…”