2010
DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtq031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root-shoot competition interactions cause diversity loss after fertilization: a field experiment in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
6
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Competition from established vege tation was found to have little effect on large‐seeded or tall‐stature species (McConnaughay and Bazzaz 1987, Reader 1993). Our finding is consistent with theoretical predictions and with empirical data showing that large‐seeded or tall‐stature species have an advantage under conditions of deep litter and dense shade (Moles and Westoby 2004, Li et al 2011a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Competition from established vege tation was found to have little effect on large‐seeded or tall‐stature species (McConnaughay and Bazzaz 1987, Reader 1993). Our finding is consistent with theoretical predictions and with empirical data showing that large‐seeded or tall‐stature species have an advantage under conditions of deep litter and dense shade (Moles and Westoby 2004, Li et al 2011a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Empirical evidence is fully consistent with this prediction, showing that whenever both fertilization and shading were manipulated independently in order to test their effects on species richness, fertilization reduced species richness while shading did not (Rajaniemi ; Dickson & Foster ; Li et al . ). This pattern was obtained even if both treatments (fertilization and shading) reduced the amount of light to the same level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Li et al. ), but shows that these effects are productivity‐dependent. Nevertheless, this trend disappeared when we considered changes 5 yrs after land‐use changes were introduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%