2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2010.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root reinforcement effect of different grass species: A comparison between experimental and models results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
36
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, many claim root tensile strength depends on its diameter (e.g. Tosi 2007;Comino et al 2010). Interestingly, Zhang et al (2014) performed biomechanical and biochemical tests to determine why root tensile strength tends to decrease with increasing root diameter.…”
Section: Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, many claim root tensile strength depends on its diameter (e.g. Tosi 2007;Comino et al 2010). Interestingly, Zhang et al (2014) performed biomechanical and biochemical tests to determine why root tensile strength tends to decrease with increasing root diameter.…”
Section: Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al 2012). To estimate the strength of soil permeated with roots, various direct shear tests (Waldron 1977;Mickovski et al 2010;Stanczak and Oumeraci 2012) and in situ tests (Endo and Tsuruta 1969;Fan and Chen 2010;Comino et al 2010) were carried out. The increase in shear strength is often considered to be due to the roots via several mechanisms such as stretching, sliding, pullout and breakage (Waldron and Dakessian 1981).…”
Section: Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Root area ratio was defined as the fraction of the soil cross sectional area occupied by roots per unit of the excavated area (Comino et al, 2010) and it was assumed that roots are circular in crosssection. Excavations were executed (1.0 m wide and at least 0.80 m bgl) at a distance of approximately 0.5 m from the tree.…”
Section: Field Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alfalfa sprouts (Medicago sativa) were used in the experiments to simulate natural vegetation [60][61][62][63], because the cohesion provided by alfalfa roots to non-cohesive sand has a magnitude comparable to that in natural river banks provided by root-reinforcement [63,64]. In this study, alfalfa seeds were seeded manually as uniformly as possible over the entire experimental sand surface.…”
Section: General Description Of the Flume Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%