Root of trust for trusted node based-on ARM11 platform

Adnan, L. H.; Hashim, Habibah; Yussoff, Yusnani Mohd; Kamaluddin, M. U.

doi:10.1109/apcc.2011.6152919

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, to simulate the proposed TESLA protocol, we need to VOLUME 10, 2022 understand the initialization process and transmission of the initial security parameters and the initial symmetric key between the sender and the receiver before establishing the TESLA protocol process. Thus, the concept of the Root of Trust (RoT) is important as it provides the foundational security component of a connected device and is a set of implicitly trusted functions that the remainder of the system or device can use to ensure security [34]- [36]. As IoT is more concerned with wireless sensor network (WSN), we need to understand that WSN is a distributed infrastructure that establishes a trust routine between the members to ensure the security of the communication and integrity of the messages.…”

Section: Root Of Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

Empirical Studies of TESLA Protocol: Properties, Implementations, and Replacement of Public Cryptography Using Biometric Authentication

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study discusses the general overview of Timed Efficient Stream Loss-tolerant Authentication (TESLA) protocol, including its properties, key setups, and improvement protocols. The discussion includes a new proposed two-level infinite µTESLA (TLI µTESLA) protocol that solves the authentication delay and synchronization issues. We theoretically compared TLI µTESLA with the previously proposed protocols in terms of security services and showed that the new protocol prevents excessive use of the buffer in the sensor node and reduces the DoS attacks on the network. In addition, it accelerates the authentication process of the broadcasted message with less delay and assures continuous receipt of packets compared to previous TESLA Protocols. We also addressed the challenges faced during the implementation of TESLA protocol and presented the recent solutions and parameter choices for improving the efficiency of the TESLA protocol. Moreover, we focused on utilizing biometric authentication as a promising approach to replace public cryptography in the authentication process.INDEX TERMS Biometric authentication, lightweight cryptography, machine learning, TESLA protocol. I. INTRODUCTION TO LIGHTWEIGHT CRYPTOGRAPHYCurrently, the internet of things (IoT) is rapidly expanding and being applied to several fields, such as in healthcare monitoring, environmental monitoring, smart censoring, and vital decision-making in different professional careers. However, the challenging features of IoT include their involvement in constrained devices such as RFIDs, sensor devices, and mobile phones, which have limited energy resources, communication bandwidth, and memory storage. With the increase in the application of these IoT devices, they become vulnerable to malicious attacks, and thus, the implementation of efficient yet lightweight security protocols is urgently needed [1].Lightweight cryptography involves simplified encryption protocols and schemes with low computational complexity that can be processed on such constrained devices to provide adequate security, considering the limited energy, bandwidth,The associate editor coordinating the review of this manuscript and approving it for publication was Mouloud Denai .

show abstract

Section: Root Of Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

Empirical Studies of TESLA Protocol: Properties, Implementations, and Replacement of Public Cryptography Using Biometric Authentication

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…flash or NAND) in the AP and then install malicious codes (e.g. backdoor in boot loader, kernel or application) [7]. Backdoor which are created by successful attack by an intruder enables an attacker to read or modify data for any clients that are connected to the infected AP.…”

Section: B Motivationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A lightweight and secure TFTP protocol for smart environment

Isa

Mohamed

Hashim

et al. 2012

2012 International Symposium on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet of Things" (IOT) has become the everyday buzz words in recent years. As part and parcel of the Smart environment where human beings and things interact intelligently, trust and mobility becomes the basic prerequisites. However, to unify trust and mobility, a security protocol must be used for information exchanges among human and things; as well as between things and things (such as between Wi-Fi Client and Wi-Fi AP). In this paper, we present an enhancement of a security protocol for bulk data transfer amongst embedded devices (similar to the practices in IOT). We also proposed a security framework for enhancing security, trust and privacy (STP) for embedded system infrastructure. We suggested the use of lightweight symmetric encryption (for data) and asymmetric encryption (for key exchange) protocols in Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP). The target implementation of TFTP is for embedded devices such as Wi-Fi Access Points (AP) and remote Base Stations (BS). We have chosen Das U-Boot (Universal Boot loader) as the horizontal security platform for this new security implementation which is suitable for Smart Environment.

show abstract

Firmware Integrity Protection: A Survey

Marchand,

Imine,

Ouarnoughi

et al. 2023

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last years, firmware integrity protection has significantly been addressed in various contexts such as internet of things, vehicles, wireless sensor networks and other systems. However, due to variety of studied systems, the proposed approaches often make divergent and sometimes even conflicting security assumptions. In this regard, we propose in this article a complete survey of the most relevant approaches addressing the firmware integrity protection regardless the considered system or field of application. We first organize the approaches in three main categories, depending on the protection type: 1. secure update, 2. attestation, and 3. secure boot. We then propose two new taxonomies, the first one concerns secure update mechanisms and the second one considers secure boot. Moreover, we extend the scope of an existing taxonomy for attestation mechanisms by studying new approaches and discussing limitations. Finally, we identify open research challenges and then give suggestions and guidelines on how to address them.

show abstract

Root of trust for trusted node based-on ARM11 platform

Cited by 4 publications

References 4 publications

Empirical Studies of TESLA Protocol: Properties, Implementations, and Replacement of Public Cryptography Using Biometric Authentication

Empirical Studies of TESLA Protocol: Properties, Implementations, and Replacement of Public Cryptography Using Biometric Authentication

A lightweight and secure TFTP protocol for smart environment

Firmware Integrity Protection: A Survey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About