2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2004.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root mass and depth, stolons and roots formed on stolons in four cultivars of potato under water stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
71
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
16
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface area of the root system varied similarly and cultivars differed in the diameter and the dry weight of the roots. In our study, the dry weight of roots was 5.06-8.56 g. Lahlou and Ledent (2005) found that root dry weight ranged from 1.1-11.8 g. Głuska (2004) and Rykaczewska (2015) obtained similar results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The surface area of the root system varied similarly and cultivars differed in the diameter and the dry weight of the roots. In our study, the dry weight of roots was 5.06-8.56 g. Lahlou and Ledent (2005) found that root dry weight ranged from 1.1-11.8 g. Głuska (2004) and Rykaczewska (2015) obtained similar results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…These results are in agreement with those obtained by Lahlou and Ledent [19]. CH47/04 showed larger root length with thickened roots, decrease in fresh and dry weights at both field capacity of 70% and 35%.…”
Section: Vascular Tissuesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…1). A marked reduction in root length of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars was noticed under drought as shown in potato [19] and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) [20,21]. In other studies, root fresh and dry weights were significantly reduced in chickpea [22][23][24], peanut [25], mung bean [26], white clover [27] and Erythrina seedling [28].…”
Section: Root Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the water potential values of MS media in the present study were consistent with that reported by Gopal and Iwama (2007) who concluded the possibility to use the in vitro system as an alternative to field evaluations for studying the general effect of water-stress on plant growth and development. Drought is known to adversely affect plant height and weight (Deblonde and Ledent 2001;Tourneux et al 2003;Lahlou and Ledent 2005). Studies have shown that the first morphological effect of drought is leaf size reduction (Jefferies and MacKerron 1987), which results in lessened photosynthesis and reduction in dry matter accumulation in tubers (Jefferies 1993;Deblonde et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%