2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-014-2121-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root induced changes of effective 1D hydraulic properties in a soil column

Abstract: AimsRoots are essential drivers of soil structure and pore formation. This study aimed at quantifying root induced changes of the pore size distribution (PSD). The focus was on the extent of clogging vs. formation of pores during active root growth.MethodsParameters of Kosugi’s lognormal PSD model were determined by inverse estimation in a column experiment with two cover crops (mustard, rye) and an unplanted control. Pore dynamics were described using a convection–dispersion like pore evolution model.ResultsR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
2
61
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Bodner et al (2014) showed that coarser root systems would more prominently increase macro-porosity, while species with dense, finer root systems, such as grass, increase the heterogeneity of soil pore space and increase micro-pore volume. Indeed, very fine roots could permeate and so decrease large micro-pore and fine macro-pore (2·5-500 μm) volume (Scholl et al, 2014). In the present authors' experiments, the very small grass roots may therefore have blocked soil pores and slowed infiltration, whereas larger grass and willow roots may have generated preferential pathways in the soil for water flow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bodner et al (2014) showed that coarser root systems would more prominently increase macro-porosity, while species with dense, finer root systems, such as grass, increase the heterogeneity of soil pore space and increase micro-pore volume. Indeed, very fine roots could permeate and so decrease large micro-pore and fine macro-pore (2·5-500 μm) volume (Scholl et al, 2014). In the present authors' experiments, the very small grass roots may therefore have blocked soil pores and slowed infiltration, whereas larger grass and willow roots may have generated preferential pathways in the soil for water flow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…It is one of the most important soil parameters that affects prediction of slope failure mechanism, especially when soil-plant interaction in shallow soil is taken into account (Nyambayo & Potts, 2010;Sidle & Bogaard, 2016;Tsiampousi et al, 2017). Plant roots permeated into the soil matrix could modify the soil structure (Scholl et al, 2014;Ng et al, 2016) and hence affect the infiltration rate due to root growth and penetration (Ghestem et al, 2011). Effects of roots on soil infiltrability have often shown contrasting results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison of the results in Tables 4 and 5 reveals that for a given vegetated condition, the fitted parameters for SWRC are not always the same as those for SHCF. This implies that the presence of plant roots changed the soil pore size and its distribution, which are the fundamental properties that govern soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity (Scholl et al, 2014;Ng et al, 2016b). Indeed, most existing predictive equations of SHCF, including that suggested by van Genuchten (1980;Eqs (1) and (2) …”
Section: Unsaturated Soil Hydraulic Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive field and laboratory studies have shown that transpiration-induced suction could be maintained in the soil during and after rainfall Ng et al 2014;Rahardjo et al 2014;Leung et al 2015a;Ng et al in press). Recent research also argues that the presence of roots could affect the soil water retention properties and hence the suction responses (Bengough 2012;Carminati and Vetterlein 2013;Scholl et al 2014;Leung et al 2015b;Ng et al 2016aNg et al , 2016b. The ability of plants to preserve/maintain suction has important implications for slope stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%