2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root dynamics of peach trees submitted to partial rootzone drying and continuous deficit irrigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
46
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No differences in yield between DI treatments were found, although the yield was lower than in fully irrigated trees (Tapia et al, 2009). PRD resulted in a lower reduction in root growth than the obtained with SDI with respect to the full irrigation treatment (Abrisqueta et al, 2008).…”
Section: Prunus Spmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…No differences in yield between DI treatments were found, although the yield was lower than in fully irrigated trees (Tapia et al, 2009). PRD resulted in a lower reduction in root growth than the obtained with SDI with respect to the full irrigation treatment (Abrisqueta et al, 2008).…”
Section: Prunus Spmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Apart from these, the minirhizotron technique, which uses a miniature video camera or a scanner to view and record root images through a transparent tube inserted in the soil, is less destructive than coring and enables time-course changes in root growth to be monitored (Upchurch & Ritchie, 1983;McMichael & Taylor, 1987;Smit et al, 2000;Hendricks et al, 2006). This methodology has been widely applied to the study of root dynamics in annual plants (Machado et al, 2003;Yang et al, 2003), forest trees (Day et al, 2006) and fruit trees (Fernández et al, 1992;Abrisqueta et al, 1994Abrisqueta et al, , 2008Wells et al, 2002;Bernier & Robitaille, 2004), as well as for measuring root production and mortality in several tree species (Comas et al, 2000;Crocker et al, 2003), but has been little used for evaluating the response to different crop management practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result was also reported by Giorio et al (1999) and Saei et al (2006). Closing of stomata, as a result of drought stress, has been attributed to increasing of the distribution of Abcisic Acid from root to leaves (Levy et al, 1978;Abrisqueta et al, 2008). Stomata closure in plants is an adaptation mechanism to water deficit, which causes water saving and protect plants against drought stress (Moriana et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%