2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-009-9941-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root cohesion of forest species in the Italian Alps

Abstract: Forests can prevent and/or mitigate hydrogeomorphic hazards in mountainous landscapes. Their effect is particularly relevant in the case of shallow landslides phenomena, where plants decrease the water content of the soil and increase its mechanical strength. Although such an effect is well known, its quantification is a relatively new challenge. The present work estimates the effect of some forest species on hillslope stability in terms of additional root cohesion by means of a model based on the classical Wu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
155
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
24
155
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Kim et al, 2013), a linear decrease of c r with depth up to a given rooting depth d r (m) was assumed, accounting for the distribution of roots with depth as observed in other studies (e.g. Bischetti et al, 2005Bischetti et al, , 2009. If the rooting depth exceeds the regolith depth, c r is only considered down to the regolith-bedrock interface (roots are not expected to penetrate the bedrock).…”
Section: Trigrs 20 Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al, 2013), a linear decrease of c r with depth up to a given rooting depth d r (m) was assumed, accounting for the distribution of roots with depth as observed in other studies (e.g. Bischetti et al, 2005Bischetti et al, , 2009. If the rooting depth exceeds the regolith depth, c r is only considered down to the regolith-bedrock interface (roots are not expected to penetrate the bedrock).…”
Section: Trigrs 20 Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Betula laminifera the amount of values were 79.4 and -0.63 by Genet et al (2010). For Salix purpurea, which was studied by Bischetti et al (2009) therefore the difference in tensile strength is so obvious. As Nilaweera (1994) mentioned, the value of ߙ is between 29.1 and 87.0 and for ߚthe range is between -0.8 and -0.4, which is in agreement with this result.These differences imply that more studies should be conducted about the different species in different environmental conditions to gain more species model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…RAR investigated using a vertical trench profile wall method, set out in other studies (Bischetti et al, , 2009Greenwood et al, 2006;Abdi et al, 2010a, b;Ji et al, 2012;Schwarz et al, 2012). Four trees of A. mangium were selected along East-West highway, then one trench with a distance of 1 meter was dug (Abdi et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Root Area Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where, r and r a are known respectively as the tensile strength of root and RAR, both specified per diameter class and is the number of class considered [17]. In tensor form, the Cauchy strain can be further written as follows.…”
Section: Mathematical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%