2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root cause analysis improved with machine learning for failure analysis in power transformers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yan et al (2019) combine BP neural network with improved Adaboost algorithm, then combined with PNN neural network to form a series of diagnostic models for transformer faults, and finally combined with dissolved gas in oil analysis for transformer fault diagnosis. Velásquez and Lara (2020) propose a new method with the lowest computational cost, using a genetic algorithm to optimize the ANN classifier, which is used to classify faults, replacing the traditional reinforcement learning (RL) action selection process with a genetic algorithmbased optimizer. Wang et al (2016) establish a combination of intelligent methods for transformer fault diagnosis evaluation and neural network case inference based on a knowledge base and an oil chromatography fault diagnosis case base.…”
Section: Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yan et al (2019) combine BP neural network with improved Adaboost algorithm, then combined with PNN neural network to form a series of diagnostic models for transformer faults, and finally combined with dissolved gas in oil analysis for transformer fault diagnosis. Velásquez and Lara (2020) propose a new method with the lowest computational cost, using a genetic algorithm to optimize the ANN classifier, which is used to classify faults, replacing the traditional reinforcement learning (RL) action selection process with a genetic algorithmbased optimizer. Wang et al (2016) establish a combination of intelligent methods for transformer fault diagnosis evaluation and neural network case inference based on a knowledge base and an oil chromatography fault diagnosis case base.…”
Section: Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intelligent techniques help to resolve the uncertainty of traditional DGA methods due to boundary problems and unresolved codes or multi-fault scenarios (Wani et al, 2021). Researchers have applied many artificial intelligence techniques to DGA fault diagnosis, such as neural networks (Duan and Liu, 2011;Wang et al, 2016;Qi et al, 2019;Yan et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2019Yang et al, , 2020Luo et al, 2020;Velásquez and Lara, 2020;Mi et al, 2021;Taha et al, 2021;Zhou et al, 2021), support vector machine (SVM) (Wang and Zhang, 2017;Fang et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2018;Illias and Liang, 2018;Kari et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2019;Zeng et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019;Zhang Y. et al, 2020;Benmahamed et al, 2021), and clustering (Islam et al, 2017;Misbahulmunir et al, 2020). These techniques involve statistical machine learning, deep learning, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is perhaps why some recent research developments in hybrid ML and statistics have focussed on enabling offline and online failure diagnosis for wear loss in complex components. The application of ML techniques such as Gaussian mixture regression (GMR) support vector machines (SVMs), whereas multiple linear regression (MLR), Gaussian process regression (GPR), and artificial neural networks (ANNs) [31], [34], 46], offer reasonable classification and separation of individual operating conditions during faults diagnosis; however, they have also been criticised for providing limited information about the physics of FMs, which may hinder their ability to achieve comprehensive asset management decisions [58], [61]. Specifically, both GMR and GPR require a large number of datasets and incur high computational costs for accurate and routine failure diagnosis; MLR lacks the consistency to always connect causal inputs to failure outputs [62]; ANN suffers from inconsistent neural network weight allocation values, which in turn produces inconsistent outputs [63]; and SVM uses data subsets (i.e., smaller datasets) that may lead to inaccuracies [64].…”
Section: A Revisiting Hybrid Systems For Failure Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By connecting BP-Adaboost in series with PNN, it not only improves the defect of BP-Adaboost algorithm which does not diagnose samples, but also improves the defect of PNN model which has low diagnostic accuracy. (Arias Velásquez and Mejía Lara, 2020) proposed a new method with the lowest computational cost, using genetic algorithm to optimize ANN classifier, which was used to classify faults with genetic algorithm-based optimizer instead of the traditional RL action selection process. However, the DGA method is often limited to fault classification of transformer fault states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%