Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth

Abstract

Our systematic review could not specify which type of post and core system should be used when two or three dentine walls remain. More RCTs are needed to confirm whether fibre-reinforced post and core systems are superior and to clarify the influence of the remaining tooth structure on the treatment outcome of the different post and core systems available. Well-defined inclusion criteria focusing on the number of dentine walls (two or three) should be used.

Impact of post adhesion on stress distribution: an in silico study

“…Non-bonded posts exhibited significantly higher stress concentrations compared to bonded posts, particularly for Ti posts due to their high elastic modulus. This aligns with clinical observations where non-bonded posts increase the likelihood of mechanical failures such as root fractures [ 11 , 16 , 28 ]. While FRC posts maintained more favorable stress distributions even in non-bonded states, their adhesion degradation over time cannot be overlooked [ 3 ].…”

Impact of post adhesion on stress distribution: an in silico study

“…Non-bonded posts exhibited significantly higher stress concentrations compared to bonded posts, particularly for Ti posts due to their high elastic modulus. This aligns with clinical observations where non-bonded posts increase the likelihood of mechanical failures such as root fractures [ 11 , 16 , 28 ]. While FRC posts maintained more favorable stress distributions even in non-bonded states, their adhesion degradation over time cannot be overlooked [ 3 ].…”

Reconstructing root treated teeth using post and core – A Systematic Review

“…As the result of Network Metal-analysis on the primary studies of RCT, in all levels of treatment failure aspects (loss of stuck, failure in endodontic, Periodontics and decay, post fracture, and root fracture), and in all treatment failures, cast posts had the less failure than other posts (PM.GF), and they were the best posts to restore teeth. The mentioned results aligned with the studies of Figueiredo et al (Figueiredo 2015), and Zhou et al (Zhou 2013), but they are in contrast with the results of Bolla (Bolla 2007).…”

An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Evaluating the Success Rate of Prosthetic Restorations on Endodontically Treated Teeth

“…Based on the number of correct responses, the level of bias was reported as high, medium, or low (Table 2). In this study, the risk of bias was moderate [including five S/M-R: [44,45,47,56,57]] and low [including nine S/M-R: [46,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]]. In addition, 41.5% of all surveys represented low-risk S/M-R (Table 1).…”

“…Clinically, however, dentists engage in cast/core posts when dealing with moderate to high tissue loss. Findings from various studies show that nonmetallic fiber posts work better than metal posts [55,62,63]. However, the overall evidence in this area is relatively weak and should be interpreted more accurately.…”

Impact of post adhesion on stress distribution: an in silico study

“…Non-bonded posts exhibited significantly higher stress concentrations compared to bonded posts, particularly for Ti posts due to their high elastic modulus. This aligns with clinical observations where non-bonded posts increase the likelihood of mechanical failures such as root fractures [ 11 , 16 , 28 ]. While FRC posts maintained more favorable stress distributions even in non-bonded states, their adhesion degradation over time cannot be overlooked [ 3 ].…”

Reconstructing root treated teeth using post and core – A Systematic Review

“…As the result of Network Metal-analysis on the primary studies of RCT, in all levels of treatment failure aspects (loss of stuck, failure in endodontic, Periodontics and decay, post fracture, and root fracture), and in all treatment failures, cast posts had the less failure than other posts (PM.GF), and they were the best posts to restore teeth. The mentioned results aligned with the studies of Figueiredo et al (Figueiredo 2015), and Zhou et al (Zhou 2013), but they are in contrast with the results of Bolla (Bolla 2007).…”

An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Evaluating the Success Rate of Prosthetic Restorations on Endodontically Treated Teeth

“…Based on the number of correct responses, the level of bias was reported as high, medium, or low (Table 2). In this study, the risk of bias was moderate [including five S/M-R: [44,45,47,56,57]] and low [including nine S/M-R: [46,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]]. In addition, 41.5% of all surveys represented low-risk S/M-R (Table 1).…”

“…Clinically, however, dentists engage in cast/core posts when dealing with moderate to high tissue loss. Findings from various studies show that nonmetallic fiber posts work better than metal posts [55,62,63]. However, the overall evidence in this area is relatively weak and should be interpreted more accurately.…”

Impact of post adhesion on stress distribution: an in silico study

“…Non-bonded posts exhibited significantly higher stress concentrations compared to bonded posts, particularly for Ti posts due to their high elastic modulus. This aligns with clinical observations where non-bonded posts increase the likelihood of mechanical failures such as root fractures [ 11 , 16 , 28 ]. While FRC posts maintained more favorable stress distributions even in non-bonded states, their adhesion degradation over time cannot be overlooked [ 3 ].…”

Reconstructing root treated teeth using post and core – A Systematic Review

“…As the result of Network Metal-analysis on the primary studies of RCT, in all levels of treatment failure aspects (loss of stuck, failure in endodontic, Periodontics and decay, post fracture, and root fracture), and in all treatment failures, cast posts had the less failure than other posts (PM.GF), and they were the best posts to restore teeth. The mentioned results aligned with the studies of Figueiredo et al (Figueiredo 2015), and Zhou et al (Zhou 2013), but they are in contrast with the results of Bolla (Bolla 2007).…”

An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Evaluating the Success Rate of Prosthetic Restorations on Endodontically Treated Teeth

“…Based on the number of correct responses, the level of bias was reported as high, medium, or low (Table 2). In this study, the risk of bias was moderate [including five S/M-R: [44,45,47,56,57]] and low [including nine S/M-R: [46,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]]. In addition, 41.5% of all surveys represented low-risk S/M-R (Table 1).…”

“…Clinically, however, dentists engage in cast/core posts when dealing with moderate to high tissue loss. Findings from various studies show that nonmetallic fiber posts work better than metal posts [55,62,63]. However, the overall evidence in this area is relatively weak and should be interpreted more accurately.…”