2020
DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root canal conicity estimation of primary maxillary central and lateral incisors—A study by Nano‐CT

Abstract: Aim: The objective of the study was to estimate the conicity of the root canals of maxillary central and lateral incisors by computed nanotomography (Nano-CT). Design: This in vitro study included nine extracted primary maxillary central incisors and 12 maxillary lateral incisors, which were subjected to Nano-CT analysis. The resulting images of each tooth were reconstructed using the OnDemand3D software, and root canal area, volume, and taper analysis were performed using the free FreeCAD 0.18 software for th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, although the most indicated file size and tapers belonging to each instrumentation system were selected to fit the experimental model, it is acknowledged that the compared files showed some differences with regard to the size and tapers. The rationale for selecting these instruments/tapers are based on the evidence suggesting that the minimum apical taper instrumentation for primary incisors lies between #40 and #50 (K-files), 39,40 which is also the reason for the use of HF#45 in this study. With respect to the reciprocating movement, a previous study showed that the R40 file has been the most suited one for apical preparation of the prototype used in the present study, which offers the best compromise between dentin removal, non-instrumented areas, and the presence of debris.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, although the most indicated file size and tapers belonging to each instrumentation system were selected to fit the experimental model, it is acknowledged that the compared files showed some differences with regard to the size and tapers. The rationale for selecting these instruments/tapers are based on the evidence suggesting that the minimum apical taper instrumentation for primary incisors lies between #40 and #50 (K-files), 39,40 which is also the reason for the use of HF#45 in this study. With respect to the reciprocating movement, a previous study showed that the R40 file has been the most suited one for apical preparation of the prototype used in the present study, which offers the best compromise between dentin removal, non-instrumented areas, and the presence of debris.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%