2012
DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rts034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root and leaf functional trait relations in Poaceae species: implications of differing resource-acquisition strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
114
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
12
114
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…See Fig. 3 for species codes turn could rank grass species along gradients, such as from conservative-strategy to acquisitive one with, respectively, deep and coarse root system or shallow and thin root system (Fort et al 2013), or also could discriminate for drought tolerance (Craine et al 2012) or dehydration avoidance (Zwicke et al 2015). Going further on roots traits appears also promising in order to better understand below-ground processes as shown by recent studies (see Ke et al 2015;Legay et al 2014;Grigulis et al 2013).…”
Section: From Empirical To Predictive Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Fig. 3 for species codes turn could rank grass species along gradients, such as from conservative-strategy to acquisitive one with, respectively, deep and coarse root system or shallow and thin root system (Fort et al 2013), or also could discriminate for drought tolerance (Craine et al 2012) or dehydration avoidance (Zwicke et al 2015). Going further on roots traits appears also promising in order to better understand below-ground processes as shown by recent studies (see Ke et al 2015;Legay et al 2014;Grigulis et al 2013).…”
Section: From Empirical To Predictive Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strategies are likely related to plant functional traits associated with the trade-off between fast growth or acquisitive-resource-use strategies and slow growth or conservative-resource-use strategies: slow growth confers stress resistance by reducing C demand for growth, thereby allowing for greater investment in defence traits (Chapin et al 1993). In support of this hypothesis, drought tolerance through foliage senescence has been linked to resource-conservative growth strategies (Perez-Ramos et al 2013), and traits like high root tissue density (RTD) and root dry matter content (RDMC) have been linked to drought resistance (Fort et al 2013;Ryser 1996;Tjoelker et al 2005;Wahl and Ryser 2000). However, in contrast with this hypothesis, thinner roots and the ability to elongate roots into deeper soil layers-both root traits linked to resource-acquisitive strategies-have been linked to drought avoidance and maintained growth under drought conditions (Comas et al 2013;Padilla et al 2013;Perez-Ramos et al 2013;Zwicke et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Experimental evidence of such an acquisitionconservation trade-off for fine roots across species is missing as a consequence of the scarcity of data related to root functioning and in particular with regard to resource acquisition and life span. Recent multivariate comparative root studies have generally focused on covariation of morphological and chemical fine-root traits (Chen et al, 2013;Fort et al, 2013Fort et al, , 2015Kong et al, 2014;Prieto et al, 2015), but how these syndromes are related to root functioning remains poorly understood. In a recent review, Reich (2014) suggested the existence of an RES representing a trade-off between root growth and persistence in fine roots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%