Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0078188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Room-temperature magnetoresistive and magnetocaloric effect in La1−xBaxMnO3 compounds: Role of Griffiths phase with ferromagnetic metal cluster above Curie temperature

Abstract: The evolution of the Griffiths phase (GP) with a ferromagnetic metal (FMM) cluster above the Curie temperature (TC) and its effect on the magnetic properties, electrical transport, magnetoresistance (MR), and magnetocaloric effect (MCE) is studied comprehensively, using bulk compounds of La1−xBaxMnO3 (0.15 ≤ x ≤ 0.25) with different lattice distortions but with the same structural symmetry and space group. These La1−xBaxMnO3 samples show ferromagnetic transition at TC increasing from 229 K for x = 0.15–300 K f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher interconnection grains number with clusters of small grains forming densely packed aggregates (2.55 ± 1.25) μm can also justify this significant porosity, as observed in the SEM image ( Figure 2 d). Thus, we can see that the initial powder particle size distribution significantly affects the density and microstructure of the ceramics, as reported in other oxides [ 25 , 26 , 27 ]. Herein, the larger particle sizes for the P-1000 powder resulted in ceramics with higher porosities than those produced using the P-900 powder with smaller particles.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher interconnection grains number with clusters of small grains forming densely packed aggregates (2.55 ± 1.25) μm can also justify this significant porosity, as observed in the SEM image ( Figure 2 d). Thus, we can see that the initial powder particle size distribution significantly affects the density and microstructure of the ceramics, as reported in other oxides [ 25 , 26 , 27 ]. Herein, the larger particle sizes for the P-1000 powder resulted in ceramics with higher porosities than those produced using the P-900 powder with smaller particles.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…From the adjustment of Equation (13) to the impedance spectroscopy experimental data, it was possible to determine the R and C values for the grain and grain boundary regions. To compare the electrical parameters, the resistances and capacitances were normalized by the geometric parameters (𝑑∙A −1 ) of the sample and to obtain the activation energy of the grain and grain boundary regions through the Arrhenius plot [ 27 ]; see Figure 9 . To obtain the grain activation, and grain boundary energies, the Arrhenius equation for electrical conductivity was used, given by Equation (14): where is the electrical conductivity associated with the charge carriers available for conduction in , is the activation energy required for the carrier to move in the crystal lattice of the ceramic in , is the Boltzmann constant in , and is the temperature in .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 exhibits the M 2 -µ 0 H/M curve (Arrott cure) of the MnCoGeGa 0.02 alloy based on Figure 7a, where the temperature range is 250-340 K. According to some related reports [20,21], the presence of a negative slope or S shape in the Arrott curve verifies a first-order phase transition. As shown in Figure 8, the S-shaped curve is observed near structural transition, implying that the first-order magnetostructural transition occurs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It should be noted that numerous recent works applied AFM data in conjunction with X-ray experiments to characterize interfaces, for example [ 35 , 36 ]. However, in these publications interfacial roughness has been only considered in terms of root-mean-square (rms) roughness height σ , which has several downsides.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%