2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2018.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Room-temperature epitaxy of metal thin films on tungsten diselenide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, thermodynamic analysis can be carried out for projections of expected metal reactions with selenides and tellurides, and indeed, a recent experimental report of metal epitaxy and reactivity with few-layer WSe 2 was consistent with calculated isothermal phase diagrams. 21 Defect sites may also enhance a 2D material's reactivity, 18,79 which is an important consideration as selenides and tellurides tend to be more defective than sulfides, and CVD-grown 2D materials tend to be more defective than exfoliated 2D materials. 55 Additionally, since the bond energy is weaker for Mo−Te and Mo−Se than Mo−S, 55,80 it is reasonable to expect that they would be even more susceptible to metal evaporation-induced damage and reactions at their contacts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, thermodynamic analysis can be carried out for projections of expected metal reactions with selenides and tellurides, and indeed, a recent experimental report of metal epitaxy and reactivity with few-layer WSe 2 was consistent with calculated isothermal phase diagrams. 21 Defect sites may also enhance a 2D material's reactivity, 18,79 which is an important consideration as selenides and tellurides tend to be more defective than sulfides, and CVD-grown 2D materials tend to be more defective than exfoliated 2D materials. 55 Additionally, since the bond energy is weaker for Mo−Te and Mo−Se than Mo−S, 55,80 it is reasonable to expect that they would be even more susceptible to metal evaporation-induced damage and reactions at their contacts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is unclear how many layers deep the reactions penetrate the 2D material, which is important for contacts to monolayer versus multilayer materials. A previous study points to the lack of interfacial reaction as a requirement for epitaxy of metals on 2D materials, 21 and Ag, Au, Pb, Pd, Pt, Al, Cu, and Zn films were found (by TEM) to grow epitaxially on MoS 2 , indicating that these metals do not react with MoS 2 . 22 Other studies have reported large strain effects from thin (1−3 nm) evaporated metals on MoS 2 using Raman spectroscopy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19 Alternatively, 2DC/metal interfaces with crystallographic registry can be formed through van der Waals epitaxy. 20 During physical vapor deposition, thin metal films tend to preferentially align on 2DCs, 21,22 which results in periodic (Moiré) structural and electronic variations at the interface due to the lattice mismatch. We demonstrate a platform that brings together concepts from each of these areas: aligned 2DC/metal interfaces, SPP-exciton coupling, and 2D quantum emitters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Cooley et al [4] noted that aluminum does not follow the mechanism of epitaxial growth on WSe 2 crystal surface, unlike such metals as Au, Ag, Cu, Pd and Co. Authors explain this effect with the fact that aluminum forms strong chemical bonds with selenium and becomes immobile on this substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%