2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Room air temperature affects occupants’ physiology, perceptions and mental alertness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
61
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
6
61
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Seppänen et al [30] quantified a performance decrease of 2% per each degree Celsius of air temperature increase in the range of 25-32 • C and recommended 22 • C as the optimal temperature. Tham [32] reported a workers' performance maximized at 24.5 • C in a call centre in Singapore with a ventilation rate of 10 L s −1 -per person; but in a further simulation analysis, Tham and Willem [33] concluded that air temperature around 20 • C can improve mental arousal and performance in activities requiring attention. Tanabe et al [31] studied the effect of moderately high temperature on task performance and fatigue with 40 college-age subjects, showing an increase of fatigue and decrease in deoxygenated haemoglobin at an operative temperature of 33 • C. Wargocki et al [36] showed benefits for health, thermal comfort, and productivity in the case of higher ventilation rates: for example, the authors found a significant improvement in typing and in creative thinking at a ventilation rate of 10 L s −1 per person compared to 3 L s −1 per person.…”
Section: F1: Impact Of the Environmental Conditions On Workers' Perfomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seppänen et al [30] quantified a performance decrease of 2% per each degree Celsius of air temperature increase in the range of 25-32 • C and recommended 22 • C as the optimal temperature. Tham [32] reported a workers' performance maximized at 24.5 • C in a call centre in Singapore with a ventilation rate of 10 L s −1 -per person; but in a further simulation analysis, Tham and Willem [33] concluded that air temperature around 20 • C can improve mental arousal and performance in activities requiring attention. Tanabe et al [31] studied the effect of moderately high temperature on task performance and fatigue with 40 college-age subjects, showing an increase of fatigue and decrease in deoxygenated haemoglobin at an operative temperature of 33 • C. Wargocki et al [36] showed benefits for health, thermal comfort, and productivity in the case of higher ventilation rates: for example, the authors found a significant improvement in typing and in creative thinking at a ventilation rate of 10 L s −1 per person compared to 3 L s −1 per person.…”
Section: F1: Impact Of the Environmental Conditions On Workers' Perfomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is thermal comfort is the highest at the 23°C condition. Two studies (Lan et al, 2012, Tham andWillem, 2010) proved that the preferred indoor air temperature level for occupants' comfort is regardless of energy efficiency considerations.…”
Section: Physical Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In winter the indoor air temperature for optimum performance can be decreased from 21.9 to 19.7°C. Another laboratory study of (Tham and Willem, 2010) tested thermal comfort level and time exposure of occupants in three different room conditions. The result is thermal comfort is the highest at the 23°C condition.…”
Section: Physical Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of this, some studies examined the impact of basic thermal environment (e.g., coldness and heat) on performance [1][2][3][4]. According to Seppänen and Fisk (2006), individuals' activity levels are highest when the indoor temperature is 21.6℃, while activity level falls at temperatures below and above that [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choi and Chun (2009) examined attentional level at 20℃ and 23℃ and found that in general, an indoor temperature of 23℃ provides an environment more conducive to concentration [1]. However, Tham and Willem (2010) used indoor temperature conditions at 20℃, 23℃, and 26℃ and found that, unlike in the previous study by Choi and Chun (2009), the difference in concentration levels at 20℃ and 23℃ was not statistically significant, whereas 26 ℃ provided the optimal environment for concentration, as measured by faster reaction times and reduced error rates [4]. On the other hand, Kim et al (1996) studied participants' performance on a word-combination-task at 23℃ and 26℃ and found that the performance difference at these two temperatures was not statistically significant [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%