1999
DOI: 10.1080/00038628.1999.9696872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roof Surface Wind Speed Distributions on Low-rise Buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest mean surface flow was recorded by CP-2 (which is installed on R1), and was around 55% higher than the approach flow. In a small-scale wind tunnel study conducted by Cochran et al (1999) on roof shingles, mean surface flows of up to 60% higher than the mean approach flow (measured at model eave height) were recorded. Probe CP-1, which was installed at the corner gable-end experienced mean roof speed factors of less than one for most wind directions.…”
Section: Tile Surface Wind Flow Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highest mean surface flow was recorded by CP-2 (which is installed on R1), and was around 55% higher than the approach flow. In a small-scale wind tunnel study conducted by Cochran et al (1999) on roof shingles, mean surface flows of up to 60% higher than the mean approach flow (measured at model eave height) were recorded. Probe CP-1, which was installed at the corner gable-end experienced mean roof speed factors of less than one for most wind directions.…”
Section: Tile Surface Wind Flow Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…it assumes the loading mechanism for wind to be the same for short and long duration gusts and that it varies with the square of the wind speed only. Peterka et al (1997) also evaluated an upper bound value of 2.5 for V s / V̅ a,h in one story buildings with shingled roofs, which was later confirmed to be conservative by Cochran et al (1999).…”
Section: Roof Tile Loading Model -Florida Building Codementioning
confidence: 92%