2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2020.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Romik's conjecture for the Jacobi theta function

Abstract: Dan Romik recently considered the Taylor coefficients of the Jacobi theta function around the complex multiplication point i. He then conjectured that the Taylor coefficients d(n) either vanish or are periodic modulo any prime p; this was proved by the combined efforts of Scherer and Guerzhoy-Mertens-Rolen, who considered arbitrary half integral weight modular forms. We refine previous work for p ≡ 1 (mod 4) by displaying a concise algebraic relation between d n + p−1 2 and d(n) related to the p-adic factorial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are now in a position to prove our first main result. The following theorem proves Conjecture 18(3) in [10], in the stronger form given in Theorem 1(1).…”
Section: The Sequence (V(n)) N≥0 Modulo Odd Prime Powersmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We are now in a position to prove our first main result. The following theorem proves Conjecture 18(3) in [10], in the stronger form given in Theorem 1(1).…”
Section: The Sequence (V(n)) N≥0 Modulo Odd Prime Powersmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Without any doubt, Equation (2.9) does provide a recursive way to compute the coefficients d(n). Indeed, Scherer [8] and Wakhare [10] used it for the proof of their results. However, in our opinion the suitability of (2.9) for the proof of congruence relations satisfied by the d(n)'s using inductive arguments is limited.…”
Section: Romik's Recursive Procedures For the Computation Of D(n)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…around τ 0 = i (we refer to [2,8,10,15,16]). Romik defined (d(n)) ∞ n=0 to be the sequence such that…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…around τ 0 = i (we refer to [8], [10], [2], [15], and [16]). Romik defined (d(n)) ∞ n=0 to be the sequence such that…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%